The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Identifying Constraints to Financial Inclusion and Their Impact on GDP and Inequality: A Structural Framework for Policy
Open accessAbstract
We develop a micro-founded general equilibrium model with heterogeneous agents to identify pertinent constraints to financial inclusion. We evaluate quantitatively the policy impacts of relaxing each of these constraints separately, and in combination, on GDP and inequality. We focus on three dimensions of financial inclusion: access (determined by the size of participation costs), depth (determined by the size of collateral constraints resulting from limited commitment), and intermediation efficiency (determined by the size of interest rate spreads and default possibilities due to costly monitoring). We take the model to a firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey for six countries at varying degrees of economic development—three low-income countries (Uganda, Kenya, Mozambique), and three emerging market countries (Malaysia, the Philippines, and Egypt). The results suggest that alleviating different financial frictions have a differential impact across countries, with country-specific characteristics playing a central role in determining the linkages and tradeoffs between inclusion, GDP, inequality, and the distribution of gains and losses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The literature indicates that the application of an individual indicator may lead to partial information and misleading conclusions, hence the proposal of a composite financial inclusion index (Makina and Walle 2019; Jungo et al. 2022; Dabla-Norris et al. 2015).”
From Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa—A Panel ARDL and Granger Non-Causality Approach (2023) · cites this paper as Dabla-Norris et al. 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jima, M. D., & Makoni, P. L. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm16060299 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Dabla-Norris, E., Ji, Y., Townsend, R., & Unsal, F.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- IMF Working Papers
- Publisher
- International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 022
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- 1018-5941
- OpenAlex
- W3123136227
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Keywords
- financial inclusion, financial frictions, access to finance, collateral constraints, limited commitment, interest rate spreads, default risk, costly monitoring, heterogeneous agents, general equilibrium model, gross domestic product, income inequality, financial policy, low-income countries, emerging markets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review