Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 64ICT in Developing CommunitiesEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesMigration and Exile Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Social Informatics Analysis of Refugee Mobile Phone Use: A Case Study of Za’atari Syrian Refugee Camp

Open access
Maitland, Carleen, Xu, Ying·2015·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Given the scourge of armed conflict and increasing incidents of severe weather, the numbers of displaced persons around the globe is at all-time high. For those fleeing armed conflict, they may arrive in their new location with a mobile phone and in some cases well-developed internet skills. This changing landscape and skill sets of refugees are creating challenges and opportunities alike for the United Nations agencies (e.g. UNHCR, World Food Program, UNICEF) and implementation partners tasked with meeting their needs. Also, as globally the average length of stay in a refugee camp is 17 years, this scenario represents an interesting use case at the intersection of the traditional information and communication technologies for development (ICTD) and crisis informatics disciplines. In particular, this research seeks to understand: What level of mobile phone ownership and use is typical among refugee camp youth? How has their use changed (if at all) between the pre-conflict and refugee lives? What types of internet-based services might interest refugee youth and what are service providers likely to make available? Data for this exploratory research were collected via pen-and-paper survey in the Za’atari Syrian Refugee Camp in Jordan in January 2015. Za’atari is an outlier among refugee camps, with its wealthier and more IT-savvy refugee population. Hence, this analysis helps understand mobile phone use in what is now the state-of-art refugee context, but is likely to reflect future conditions in other camps around the world. Based on data from 174 youth, the research finds 86% of youth own mobile handsets and 83% own SIM cards. Even with reasonably high levels of SIM card ownership, 79% of youth also borrow SIM cards from friends and family. Unsurprisingly, mobile phones are the most popular medium for accessing the internet. This was true in Syria as well, but is even more so in the camp. In the camp, over half of youth access the internet one or more times per day. In terms of communication services, WhatsApp was the most frequently used to communicate to those in both Jordan and Syria, while mobile voice was used more frequently for communicating within Jordan. When asked about favorite online information sources, the six most frequently mentioned were: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Skype, TV and Wikipedia, with Google being significantly more popular. Without resource constraints, the youth indicated they would like more access to Instant Messaging/WhatsApp, news sources and increased opportunities to communicate with people via social media. Like many youth around the globe, the Za’atari youth frequently help family and friends as well as receive help to use the internet. A multivariate analysis examining predictors of camp-based internet use found education, sex and previous experience, respectively, are the most significant predictors. These results are in line with findings on internet use from studies in a variety of contexts. Given the high level of internet use among refugees, they appear to be likely candidates for online programming. However, youth have less computer as compared to mobile phone experience than the adults. Hence, basic computer training may be necessary prior to successful online program implementation. Additionally, our experience and observations in the camp suggest the UN agencies and their implementation partners have the skills to successfully implement such a program. These results provide interesting evidence of the use of mobile phones as an important source of information for displaced persons. It also provides insights into the transition from a crisis to the recovery phase of a disaster. As Za’atari camp continues to grow and develop from a temporary to a somewhat permanent residence, the diversity and complexity of ICT-based services evolves as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2588300

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Mara Balestrini, 2014, Understanding sustained community engagement: a case study in heritage preservation in rural Argentina, 2675
  2. Anna Crowe, 2014, Taking Privacy and Data Protection Seriously in M4D Initiatives, Proceedings of 4th International Conference on M4D Mobile Communication for Development, 107
  3. Alison Gillwald, 2010, Paper 5 -Gender Assessment of ICT Access and Usage in Africa, Gender Assessment of ICT Access and Usage in Africa. Policy, 1, 1
  4. 10.1145/2470654.2466134 · DOI
  5. Kate Judge, 2014, How technology supports family communication in rural, suburban, and urban kenya, Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems -CHI '14, 2705
  6. 2014, SmartphoneThe New York Times, The New York Times. 2015. A 21st-Century Migrant's Essentials: Food, Shelter
  7. Unops, 2014, Press release: Inauguration of Civil Defence Center in Zaatari refugee camp
  8. Wfp, Staffer Compares Two Refugee Camps: Zaatari and Dadaab
  9. 10.1145/2470654.2481391 · DOI

Cited by

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Maitland, C., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Maitland, Carleen
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2253444203
Cited by
64
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
refugee youth, mobile phone ownership, internet access, WhatsApp, social media use, crisis informatics, ICT for development, Syrian refugee camps, Zaatari refugee camp, displaced persons, online information sources, mobile communication services, digital divide, armed conflict displacement, social informatics, instant messaging, news sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.