CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Company Law and Autonomous Systems: A Blueprint for Lawyers, Entrepreneurs, and Regulators

Bayern, Shawn, Burri, Thomas, MMslein, Florian·2016·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2850514
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2850514

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The need to comply with existing legal standards often requires the establishment of formal legally recognized entities, such as LLCs or non-profit foundations, that interface with traditional frameworks while attempting to maintain a decentralized operational structure.

    “For instance, the need to comply with existing legal standards often requires the establishment of formal legally recognized entities, such as limited liability companies (LLCs) or non-profit foundations that interface with traditional frameworks while attempting to maintain a decentralized operational structure (Bayern et al., 2017).”

    From Adapting Mintzberg’s organizational theory to DeSci: the decentralized science pyramid framework (2024) · cites this paper as Bayern et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 1892, Gesetz betreffend die Gesellschaften mit beschr�nkter Haftung, 10.9785/ovs.9783504384654.1 · DOI
  2. E G See, 2006, Transfer von GmbH-Recht im 20 Jahrhundert -Export, Import, Binnenhandel, RECHTSTRANSFER IN DER GESCHICHTE: LEGAL TRANSFER IN HISTORY 446, 10.3726/978-3-653-05312-8/15 · DOI
  3. Gunter Teubner, 2006, Zur Ausweitung des Akteursstatus in Recht und Politik, 27 ZEITSCHRIFT F�R RECHTSSOZIOLOGIE, 10.1515/zfrs-2006-0103 · DOI
  4. Maltechristian Gruber, Extensively discussed by various monographs, cf, Was spricht gegen Maschinenrechte?, AUTONOME AUTOMATEN 191 (Jochen 13. See
  5. Alfred Paulick, 1979, 10.9785/ovs.9783504381455.54 · DOI
  6. Die Heino R�ck, 1994, 10.1515/9783110901566.89 · DOI
  7. 1915, Zum Erwerbe eigener Gesch�ftsanteile durch die Gesellschaft mit beschr�nkter Haftung, FESTSCHRIFT FOR COHN, 79
  8. Fleischer, 10.1590/s0104-71832013000200021 · DOI
  9. See Rolf Steding, 2003, Die gesellschafterlose GmbH -eine rechtlich zul�ssige Unternehmensvariante?, NEUE ZEITSCHRIFT F�R GESELLSCHAFTSRECHT (NZG), 57
  10. Olaf Sosnitza, Comment on �, 33, 10.1016/s0212-5382(10)70466-0 · DOI
  11. Fleischer, 10.1590/s0104-71832013000200021 · DOI
  12. Wolfgang H�sel, 1958, See also Friedrich Buchwald, Der eigene Anteil der GmbH, DEUTSCHE NOTAR-ZEITSCHRIFT (DNotZ), 5
  13. Karl Winkler, 1972, Der Erwerb eigener Gesch�ftsanteile durch die GmbH, GMBH-RUNDSCHAU (GmbHR), 73
  14. E G See, GESELLSCHAFTSRECHT 995
  15. Supra Paulick, 2000, Incorporated under the Companies Act, 71. Incorporated under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act, 15
  16. 2006, Companies Act, 46, 10.1007/978-1-137-54507-7_9 · DOI
  17. 2015, Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act, 26, 10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2015-graph41-en · DOI
  18. � 156a, 2006, ); exceptions may be provided under � 156B, 46
  19. 1911, Limited Liability Partnerships Regulations, Reg, 12
  20. 2000, Limited Liability Partnerships Act, 88. Id. �, 12
  21. 2000, Limited Liability Partnerships Act, 12, 10.1007/978-1-137-54507-7_8 · DOI
  22. 1949, The European Court of Human Rights also applied a case-by-case approach with the rights under the European Convention of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the European Union's foundational treaties. Both these courts, however, only implicitly decided on the capacity of legal persons to hold rights, for instance by allowing companies to claim violation of the right to own property. See Tettinger, supra, at 1229, N 71 and 73; see FACTSHEET-COMPANIES: VICTIMS OR CULPRITS, The law is not settled with regard to constitutional rights of companies based on public-private partnerships, however. See Peter Selmer, �53: Zur Grundrechtsberechtigung von Mischunternehmen, HANDBUCH DER GRUNDRECHTE (HGR) II, 1255, 701
  23. See Shapiro, Corporations are useful legal fictions composed of individuals who do not shed their own constitutional rights at the office-building door.") This reading lifts the "corporate veil, 102
  24. 1970, Judgment, 10.2307/2197156 · DOI
  25. I C J, Rep. 3, 40, � 57 (Feb. 5) (the corporate veil is lifted only
  26. 2016, On lifting the corporate veil in the context of constitutional rights, see Thorsten Kingreen Florian M�slein, Die Identit�t der juristischen Person: Die Hobby Lobby-Entscheidung des U.S. Supreme Court zur Glaubensfreiheit gewinnorientierter Kapitalgeselschaften, JURISTEN ZEITUNG (JZ)
  27. Malte-Christian Gruber, Was spricht gegen Maschinenrechte?, AUTONOME AUTOMATEN
  28. K�nstliche Roboter Und Artifizielle Agenten In Der Technisierten Gesellschaft, 191, 191, 10.2307/j.ctvddzqpk.13 · DOI
  29. Gruber & Sascha Ziemann Eds, 2015, one might call this an act of "functionally awarded legal personality
  30. 2010, If Citizens United were applied to a legal person hosting an artificial intelligence, it could rely on free speech in the context of elections, Teresa Sickert, K�nstliche Intelligenz: Vom Hipster-M�dchen zum Hitler-Bot, SPIEGEL ONLINE
  31. J�rg Paul M�ller & Markus Schefer, 2008, Founding an organization in order to host an artificial intelligence is therefore an act protected by constitution. By way of example, see the freedom to choose a corporate form, a right which is protected by the economic freedom, Note that constitutions regularly guarantee the right to found organizations
  32. For a case where human dignity was at issue on the European level, see Case C-36/02, Omega Spielhallen und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bayern, S., Burri, T., & MMslein, F.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
ISSN
1556-5068
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.2850514
Cited by
9
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review