Cited by 2Open Source Software InnovationsNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringIntellectual Property Rights and Media

Challenges & Opportunities Concerning Corporate Formation, Nonprofit Status, & Governance for Open Source Projects

Open access
Ritvo, Dalia, Hessekiel, Kira, Bavitz, Christopher·2017·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2937956

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early governance models, such as benevolent dictator or consensus-based meritocracies, depended on informal social contracts, technical reputation, and sustained contribution instead of codified policy.

    “Early governance models, such as the benevolent dictator paradigm or consensus-based meritocracies, depended on informal social contracts, technical reputation, and sustained contribution instead of codified policy [4, 30, 42].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritvo, D., Hessekiel, K., & Bavitz, C.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ritvo, Dalia
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122195828
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
Keywords
open source projects, corporate formation, nonprofit status, corporate governance, legal entity formation, nonprofit corporations, open source software governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review