Dataveillance Regulation: A Research Framework
Open accessAbstract
Dataveillance is the systematic creation and/or use of personal data for the investigation or monitoring of the actions or communications of one or more persons. It emerged in the 1980s, initially as a set of tools for exploiting data that had already been collected for some other purpose. Developments in information technologies, combined with a voracious appetite for social control among government agencies and corporations alike, has seen dataveillance practices diversify and proliferate. The regulatory frameworks that enable and control dataveillance activities appear not to have attracted a great deal of attention in the literature. Data privacy measures, usually referred to as (personal) data protection, have been the subject of a great deal of activity in legislatures, resulting in many countries having data protection oversight agencies and a modest level of jurisprudence. On the other hand, provisions that enable rather than constrain dataveillance are voluminous, both pre-dating data protection laws, and passed subsequently and hence often qualifying or over-ruling them. This paper presents an initial survey and structuring of the field of dataveillance regulation in a manner intended to facilitate the conduct of research in the area. Its scope extends well beyond legislation to encompass all forms of regulatory mechanism. It identifies ways in which the effectiveness or otherwise of regulatory schemes can be evaluated. It suggests a classification scheme that can be applied to dataveillance regulation through technology and by law. This lays, we believe, a foundation for the analysis of the regimes in particular jurisdictions whereby dataveillance practices are regulated, for comparisons among jurisdictions, and for comparative evaluation of degrees of freedom and of authoritarianism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data privacy has been long and extensively debated in legislatures, resulting in data protection oversight agencies and a modest level of jurisprudence, while provisions facilitating all forms of digital surveillance are voluminous.
“Data privacy has been long and extensively debated in legislatures, resulting in “data protection oversight agencies and a modest level of jurisprudence,” while provisions facilitating all forms of digital surveillance are voluminous (Clarke and Greenleaf 2017).”
From Environmentally sustainable smart cities and their converging AI, IoT, and big data technologies and solutions: an integrated approach to an extensive literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Clarke and Greenleaf 2017
Cites
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 2,978 · see citing works
Braithwaite, J. B., & Drahos, P. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9780521780339 · Cited by 1,757 · see citing works
Mann, S., Nolan, J., & Wellman, B. (2002) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Information technology and dataveillance
Clarke, R. (1988) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/42411.42413 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Self-citationRoutledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies
Fussey, P., & Coaffee, J. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203814949 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Human Identification in Information Systems
Clarke, R. (1994) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593849410076799 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationThe digital persona and its application to data surveillance
Clarke, R. (1994) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.1994.9960160 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationThe regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety
Clarke, R., & Moses, L. B. (2014) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.007 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationFroomkin, A. M. (2000) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229519 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Industry Self-Regulation: An Economic, Organizational, and Political Analysis
Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1983.4284383 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Big Data's Big Unintended Consequences
Wigan, M. R., & Clarke, R. (2013) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2013.195 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationPerson location and person tracking ‐ Technologies, risks and policy implications
Clarke, R. (2001) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593840110695767 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationThe regulation of civilian drones' impacts on behavioural privacy
Clarke, R. (2014) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.005 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenleaf, G. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679669.001.0001 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationLocation and tracking of mobile devices: Überveillance stalks the streets
Michael, K., & Clarke, R. (2013) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2013.03.004 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationIndustry Self-Regulation: An Economic, Organizational, and Political Analysis
Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257830 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Toward a State of Überveillance [Special Section Introduction
Michael, M., & Michael, K. (2010) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2010.937024 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Surfing the third wave of computing: A framework for research into eObjects
Manwaring, K., & Clarke, R. (2015) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2015.07.001 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Gaze of the Perfect Search Engine: Google as an Infrastructure of Dataveillance
Zimmer, M. T. (2008) · Information science and knowledge management · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_6 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
You are where you’ve been: the privacy implications of location and tracking technologies
Clarke, R., & Wigan, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Location Based Services · doi:10.1080/17489725.2011.637969 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationPersona missing, feared drowned: the digital persona concept, two decades later
Clarke, R. (2014) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-04-2013-0073 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationUberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants
(2013) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4582-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Clarke, R. (1994) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593849410074070 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationClarke, R. (2009) · Identity in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s12394-009-0013-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation Technology: Weapon of Authoritarianism or Tool of Democracy?
Clarke, R. A. (1994) · IFIP Congress · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy impact assessments as a control mechanism for Australian counter-terrorism initiatives
Clarke, R. (2016) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.01.009 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bibri, S. E., Alexandre, A., Sharifi, A., & Krogstie, J. (2023) · Energy Informatics · doi:10.1186/s42162-023-00259-2 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clarke, R., & Greenleaf, G.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Greenleaf, Graham
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 25
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121509972
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Journal of Law Information & Science
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Keywords
- dataveillance, surveillance regulation, research framework, privacy law, data protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
