PreprintCited by 3Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AILegal and Labor Studies

Automated Processing of Personal Data for the Evaluation of Personality Traits: Legal and Ethical Issues

Open access
Wiedemann, Klaus·2018·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This paper examines the approach under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to profiling and (automated) decision-making as well as the corresponding legal and ethical implications. The definition of profiling under the GDPR is analysed in relation to different degrees of automation when it comes to decision-making based on the processing of personal or non-personal data. A two-step approach to profiling and decision-making, which can be found in the structure and wording of the GDPR, is described and analysed. It is argued that the use of this model helps understand how profiling and decision-making are conducted and how the two steps are interconnected. Furthermore, the two-step approach allows to identify various legal implications of profiling and the corresponding decision-making, such as those related to privacy and economic freedom. Further, the discussion of ethical aspects draws on two recent and controversial use cases. The first example deals with discriminatory effects that may result from profiling. The second one concerns opaque automated decision-making in the context of credit scoring. This ethical assessment is based on the ethical framework supplied by the wording of the GDPR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3102933

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The digital abstraction of personality and ability profiles from real-world data without psychometric testing raises issues for transparency and consent.

    “the digital abstraction of personality and ability profiles from real world data without the need for psychometric testing, which raises issues for transparency and consent (Wiedemann, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiedemann, K.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (DE)
Corresponding author
Wiedemann, Klaus
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2810246961
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
General Data Protection Regulation, automated decision-making, profiling, personality traits, two-step approach, privacy, economic freedom, algorithmic discrimination, credit scoring, opacity, personal data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review