The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market - Legal Aspects
Abstract
Etude pour la Direction générale des politiques internes de l'Union, Département des droits des citoyens et des affaires constitutionnelles, Parlement européen. Commission des Affaires juridiques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, applying the TDM exception in the context of LLMs training raises non-trivial issues, as we now discuss [29,50 -52].”
From Generative AI in EU law: Liability, privacy, intellectual property, and cybersecurity (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- See Rita Morais, 2017, Open Access: 2016-2016 EUA Survey Results
- 2016, See Commission, 53, 10.1057/978-1-137-50560-6_7 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50560-6_7
- Xingquan See Xindong Wu, 2014, Jeff Schultz, How Much Data Is Created on the Internet Each Day?, DZone, IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 26
- 2014, Standardisation in the area of innovation and technological development, notably in the field of Text and Data Mining: Report from the Expert Group
- See James Manyika, 2011, Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity
- Kelly Mcdonald, 2012, 64, 17
- Christophe See, 2014, Limitations to Copyright in the Digital Age
- Research Handbook on EU Internet Law, 110, 10.4337/9781782544173 · doi:10.4337/9781782544173
- Christophe Geiger, 2012, Defining the Scope of Protection of Copyright in the EU: The Need to Reconsider the Acquis regarding Limitations and Exceptions, Codification of European Copyright Law, Challenges and Perspectives, 133
- Jonathan Griffiths, 2015, Limitations and Exceptions as Key Elements of the Legal Framework for Copyright in the European Union -Opinion on the Judgment of the CJEU in Case C-201/13 Deckmyn, 45, 93
- Christophe Geiger, 2017, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) of Consumers in relation to Copyright, Summary Report, a project commissioned by the European Union Intellectual Property Office, p. 8, to Copyright, Summary Report, a project commissioned by the European Union Intellectual Property Office
- I I Title, 2016, Exceptions and Limitations to Copyright, 61, 10.1017/9781316450901 · doi:10.1017/9781316450901
- 2016, value-chain-and-panorama-exception. Also, discussions surround the introduction of an exception for user-generated content. See also Judith Blijden, For example, despite massive mobilization and a public consultation, it seems that freedom of panorama will not be part of the directive. See European Commission
- See Martin Senftleben, 2017, The Perfect Match -Civil Law Judges and Open-Ended Fair Use Provisions, Am. U. Int'l L. Rev, 33, 231
- P, 2016, Flexible Copyright: Can EU Author's Rights Accommodate Fair Use?, New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, 417, 10.1017/9781316450901.011 · doi:10.1017/9781316450901.011
- Martin Senftleben, 2014, Comparative Approaches to Fair Use: An Important Impulse for Reforms in EU Copyright Law, Methods and Perspectives in Intellectual Property, 10.4337/9781783470532.00007 · doi:10.4337/9781783470532.00007
- Antony Dnes, 2012, Flexible Copyright: The Law and Economics of Introducing an Open Norm in the Netherlands, Should the UK Move to a Fair-Use Copyright Exception', IIC, 44, 418
- Christophe Geiger, 2008, Flexibilising Copyright -Remedies to the Privatisation of Information by Copyright Law, 39, 178
- E G See, 2017, Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author's Right Accommodate Fair Use?, Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, 275
- Pamela Samuelson, 2017, Justifications for Copyright Limitations and Exceptions, Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, 12, 10.1017/9781316450901.003 · doi:10.1017/9781316450901.003
- P, 2012, Fair Use in Europe, Search of Flexibilities
- 2016, Commission, 53, 10.18356/6a53a9be-en · doi:10.18356/6a53a9be-en
- Art, 2, 10.7748/ns.24.47.9.s12 · doi:10.7748/ns.24.47.9.s12
- Recital 11. 102 ibid., Art. 2(1) and Recital 11
- Peter Murray-Rust, 2014, Open Content Mining, 10.5334/ban.b · doi:10.5334/ban.b
- Guibault Moore ; Handke, 2013, Statement on Text and Data Mining, 72, 10.1002/9781118596289.ch19 · doi:10.1002/9781118596289.ch19
- E G See, 2017, Future-proofing European Research Excellence: A Statement from European Research Organisations on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 1
- Bundesrat, 2016, COM(2016) 593 final, Ratsdok 12254/16, � 22 (noting that the narrow scope of the EU TDM exception would put out of business many providers of data analysis in Europe) See also Martin Senftleben, Beschluss 565/16, Vorschlag f�r eine Richtlinie des Europ�ischen Parlaments und des Rates �ber das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, 5
- See Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, � 29A (UK)
- 2016, See Proposal, supra note 1, Art. 11(1)
- Proposal, 10.7748/ns.24.47.9.s12 · doi:10.7748/ns.24.47.9.s12
- Policy Allied For Startups, 2, 10.18411/a-2017-023 · DOI · Paper page
- See Geiger, 2015, service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the Union, O.J. (L, 70, 1
- Art, 3, 10.2307/j.ctt207g8bt.22 · DOI · Paper page
- E G See, 2011, (discussing most of the relevant literature and major threats that technological protection measures pose for fair dealings, 135
- S�verine Dusollier, 2003, Tipping the Scale in Favour of the Right Holders: The European Anti-Circumvention Provisions, Digital Rights Management. Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects, 462, 10.1007/10941270_29 · doi:10.1007/10941270_29
- 2000, adopted by the Council, with a view to adopting a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, 344
Cited by
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594067 · Cited by 466
“This is less of a concern for copyrighted material found in the training data by way of model inversion as the new text-and-data-mining exceptions (Articles 3 and 4 Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive5), at least generally and where rightsholders have not opted out, allow the use of publicly accessible co…”
BackgroundGenerative AI in EU law: Liability, privacy, intellectual property, and cybersecurity
Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Hacker, P., Spedicato, G., & Floridi, L. (2024) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106066 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Geiger, C., Frosio, G., & Bulayenko, O.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 1556-5068
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market - Legal Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.3160586
- The paper
- Geiger, C., Frosio, G., & Bulayenko, O. (2018). The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market - Legal Aspects. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
