Cited by 5Law, AI, and Intellectual PropertyDiverse Legal and Medical StudiesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The Policy Challenge of Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Bessen, James E.·2018·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3219887

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI can play a pivotal role in lifelong learning and skill development, particularly in the context of the rapidly evolving job market and the need for continuous upskilling.

    “It can play a pivotal role particularly in the context of the rapidly evolving job market and the need for continuous upskilling [106].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bessen, J. E.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Bessen, James E.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123658973
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence, intellectual property law, competition law, market concentration, innovation incentives, productivity growth, wage inequality, large corporations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review