Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Biometric Identification and SecurityUser Authentication and Security SystemsE-Government and Public Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternatives to Aadhaar based Biometrics in the Public Distribution System

Open access
Allu, Rakesh, Deo, Sarang, Devalkar, Sripad K.·2018·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3353989
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

States across the country are taking steps towards providing digital identities to beneficiaries of their Public Distribution System. In doing so, use of Aadhaar based biometrics seems to be the preferred choice of method. However, this method has been widely criticized for several reasons such as high implementation cost and frequent transaction failures. It is important to note that this is not the only method for providing digital identities to the beneficiaries Several other methods exist and have been adopted by different states at different points in time. States currently embarking on the journey of providing digital identities to their beneficiaries might benefit from evaluating all alternatives before making inroads into any specific method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3353989

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 2011, Now, biometric identification for ration cards too' Accessed on, Bageshree
  2. 2014, Fake ration cards pile up in 'model' PDS state, Bhardwaj
  3. M Chatterjee, 2014, An improved PDS in a 'reviving'state. Economic & Political Weekly, 49, 49
  4. 2012, Centralized Online Real-time Electronic PDS
  5. C Choithani, 2015, Assessing Bihar's Coupon-based PDS. Economic & Political Weekly
  6. Dang, 2017, Insistence On Aadhaar Is Disrupting A Successful PDS System, Chhattisgarh
  7. 2016, In Jharkhand, compulsory biometric authentication for ration sends many away empty-handed
  8. J Dr�ze, 2011, PDS Leakages: the Plot thickens, The Hindu
  9. J Dr�ze, 2013, Ration shops in coastal districts to get biometric machines' Accessed on, Aadhaar and Food Security in Jharkhand. Economic & Political Weekly, 52
  10. 2013, Aadhaar enabled PDS System (AePDS) -electronic Point of Sale (ePoS)
  11. R Khera, 2011, Trends in diversion of grain from the public distribution system, Economic and Political Weekly, 106
  12. R Khera, 2011, The UID project and welfare schemes, Economic and Political Weekly, 38
  13. Mairappan, 2015, Nearly two crore families in Tamil Nadu to get smart ration
  14. 2015, Evaluation of Targeted Public Distribution System in Selected States
  15. 2012, Biometric Bar-coded PDS system
  16. Pandey, 2017, UP Gang Found Complex Way to Make Fake Aadhaar Cards, Say Police
  17. 2016, Transforming Targeted Public Distribution System to Aadhaar enabled PDS, Accessed on 12th
  18. 2017, All family members' Aadhaar to be linked with ration cards for PDS
  19. R Puri, 2012, Reforming the public distribution system: Lessons from Chhattisgarh. Economic and Political Weekly, 21
  20. R Puri, 2016, Karnataka Opts for Biometrics to Check PDS Leakages' Accessed on, LANSA Working Paper Series, 14
  21. P Rajan, 2016, Designing for Food Security: Portability and the Expansion of User Freedoms through the COREPDS in Chhattisgarh, India. Information Technologies & International Development, 12
  22. 2016, Point of sale system in ration shops across Chennai to make PDS hassle-free
  23. Kotwal Ramaswami, 2018, Aadhaar that doesn't exclude
  24. B Ramaswamy, 2015, Incremental Reforms in Food Policy. What Are the Possibilities? In: Development in India. Micro and Macro Perspectives, 125
  25. Priya Shagun, 2016, Even in Delhi, Basing PDS on Aadhaar Is Denying Many the Right to Food
  26. N Sharma, 2017, An investigation of IT-intervention adoption in public distribution system: A stakeholder and agency theory perspective. Information Development
  27. A Somanchi, 2017, Well done ABBA? Aadhaar and the public distribution system in Hyderabad, Economic & Political Weekly
  28. Singh, 2016, Rajasthan Makes Ration Distribution Go Biometric, Creates Umbrella Card
  29. 2014, Centralised Online Real-time Electronic PDS CORE PDS, Chhattisgarh, Somasekhar
  30. M Theofanos, 2006, Envisioning a Role for Aadhaar in Public Distribution System, CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1427
  31. 2011, iii Beneficiaries submit a duly filled and attested application form along with one government ID and attested proof of income. The application form typically contains information such as name, age, occupation, financial status, address, number of family members and their individual details iv Ideally, i This information was gathered during our field visits and interviews with KFCSC officials ii The sources include Bageshree
  32. The priority households are entitled up to 5 kg per person per month at the issue prices of ?1, ?2 and ?3 per kg for rice, wheat and coarse grains respectively. The AAY households can claim up to 35 kg of food grains per household per month at the price mentioned above, while the nonpriority households are excluded from such entitlements. vii The calculation is based on the prices of biometric scanners and smart readers quoted by multiple sources. Below are the two links that can be used for verification, v The National Food Security Act (NFSA) categorizes households into priority households (PHH), nonpriority households (NPHH) and Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) households based on their financial status

Cited by

See all 13

Related

Metadata

Authors
Allu, R., Deo, S., & Devalkar, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Indian School of Business (IN)
Corresponding author
Allu, Rakesh
ORCID
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3353989
OpenAlex
W2948532670
Cited by
13
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Eprints Services at ISB (DESI) (Indian School of Business) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
Aadhaar, biometrics, digital identity, public distribution system, transaction failures, implementation costs, state welfare programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.