CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61Journalism and Media StudiesLibrary Science and Information LiteracyLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How Students Engage with News: Five Takeaways for Educators, Journalists, and Librarians

Open access
Head, Alison, Wihbey, John, Metaxas, P. Takis, MacMillan, Margy, Cohen, Dan·2018·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3503183
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3503183

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Head, A., Wihbey, J., Metaxas, P. T., MacMillan, M., & Cohen, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • Mount Royal University (CA)
Corresponding author
Wihbey, John
ORCID
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3503183
OpenAlex
W2922360163
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Wellesley College Digital RepositoryWellesley (Wellesley College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
university students, news consumption, information seeking, online news, Twitter, news literacy, journalism education, library instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review