The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: A Psycholinguistic Barrier Affecting Speaking Achievement of Saudi EFL Learners
Open accessAbstract
This study is oriented towards the analysis of the speaking achievement of the learners of English as Foreign Language (EFL) in Saudi Arabia. It aims to examine the influence of foreign language speaking anxiety as a psycholinguistic barrier affecting speaking achievement of Saudi EFL learners. It primarily attempts to answer the research quention, 'is there a correlation between foreign language speaking anxiety and the speaking achievement of Saudi Arabian EFL learners?' The data of the study were collected using questionnaires and speaking achievement tests. Samples of the study were 100 (50 male and 50 female) Preparatory Year Students studying English at Northern Border University, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to analyze data in Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 25. The results of the study revealed that there is a weak correlation between the speaking language anxiety and achievement of Saudi EFL learners in speaking, the effect size of the value of r is -0.242. Based on this result, the EFL learners with high language anxiety have less achievement in speaking test while EFL learners with low language speaking anxiety have high achievement in speaking test. The value P = 0.000 (sig. 2-tailed), which is smaller than 0.05%, indicating that language anxiety has significant negative effect on the respondents' achievement in speaking. In other words, this indicated that 1% increase in anxiety would lead to a 88.8% decrease in EFL learner's performance in speaking at 0.000 level of significance. In conclusion, the study suggested different language anxieties such as personal and interpersonal anxiety, classroom anxiety, and learners' perceptions about foreign language anxiety need to be decressed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“FLA has been found to negatively impact the language learning process and its outcomes (Al-Khotaba et al., 2020;Zare & Riasati, 2012).”
From Triggers for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: Perceptions of Saudi EFL College Students (2024) · cites this paper as Al-Khotaba et al., 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Triggers for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety: Perceptions of Saudi EFL College Students
Faqihi, M. A. (2024) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v17n2p1 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad Al-Khotaba, H. H., Alkhataba, E. H. A., Abdul-Hamid, S., & Ibrahim, B.
- Affiliations
- Northern Border University (SA)
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-329
- ISSN
- 2229-9327 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-5068
- OpenAlex
- W2998531343
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 16.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Arab World English Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- foreign language speaking anxiety, speaking achievement, EFL learners, Saudi EFL learners, personal anxiety, interpersonal anxiety, classroom anxiety, preparatory year students, English as a foreign language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review