Cited by 269Ethics and Social Impacts of AIEthics in Business and EducationFlooding and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A High-Level Overview of AI Ethics

Open access
Kazim, Emre, Koshiyama, Adriano·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics is a field that has emerged as a response to the growing concern regarding the impact of AI. It can be read as a nascent field and as a subset of the wider field of digital ethics, which addresses concerns raised by the development and deployment of new digital technologies, such as AI, big data analytics, and blockchain technologies. The principle aim of this article is to provide a high-level conceptual discussion of the field by way of introducing basic concepts and sketching approaches and central themes in AI ethics. The first part introduces concepts by noting what is being referred to by "AI" and "ethics", etc.; the second part explores some predecessors to AI ethics, namely engineering ethics, philosophy of technology, and science and technology studies; the third part discusses three current approaches to AI ethics namely, principles, processes, and ethical consciousness; and finally, the fourth part discusses central themes in translating ethics in to engineering practice. We conclude by summarizing and noting the inherent interdisciplinary future directions and debates in AI ethics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3609292

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within computer science, there is a growing overlap with Digital Ethics and Trustworthy AI, with a focus on fairness, accountability, transparency and explainability.

    “Within computer science, there is a growing overlap with the broader Digital Ethics [19] and the ethics and engineering focused on developing Trustworthy AI [11]. There is a focus on fairness, accountability, transparency and explainability [33, 82–84].”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 269

Metadata

Authors
Kazim, E., & Koshiyama, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kazim, Emre
  • Koshiyama, Adriano
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
100314-100314
ISSN
  • 2666-3899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-5068
OpenAlex
W3199717448
Cited by
269
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Patterns (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › General Engineering › Flooding and Environmental Impact
Keywords
AI ethics, digital ethics, engineering ethics, philosophy of technology, science and technology studies, ethical principles, moral consciousness, interdisciplinary research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review