Cited by 14Poverty, Education, and Child WelfarePsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Comparative Impact of Cash Transfers and a Psychotherapy Program on Psychological and Economic Well-being

Open access
Haushofer, Johannes, Mudida, Robert, Shapiro, Jeremy P.·2021·SSRN Electronic Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3759722

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Haushofer, J., Mudida, R., & Shapiro, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Busara Center for Behavioral Economics (US)
Corresponding author
Haushofer, Johannes
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155484316
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Keywords
unconditional cash transfers, psychotherapy program, psychological well-being, economic well-being, household consumption, asset holdings, mental health, poverty reduction, rural households, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review