Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A 'Spindle and Thread'-Mechanism Unblocks p53 Translation by Modulating N-Terminal Disorder

Kaldmäe, Margit, Vosselman, Thibault, Zhong, Xueying, Lama, Dilraj, Chen, Gefei, Saluri, Mihkel, Kronqvist, Nina, Wei Sau, Jia, Seng Ng, Aik, Ghadessy, Farid, Sabatier, Pierre, Vojtesek, Borivoj, Sarr, Medoune, Sahin, Cagla, Österlund, Nicklas, Ilag, Leopold, Väänänen, Venla, Sedimbi, Saikiran, Arsenain-Henriksson, Marie, Zubarev, Roman, Nilsson, Lennart, Koeck, Philip, Rising, Anna, Abelein, Axel, Fritz, Nicolas, johansson, Jan, Lane, David P., Landreh, Michael·2021

Abstract

Disordered proteins pose a major challenge to structural biology. A prominent example is the tumour suppressor p53, whose low expression levels and poor conformational stability due to a high degree of disorder hamper the development of cancer therapeutics. Here, we probe the role of N-terminal disorder in p53 by fusing the protein to an engineered spider silk domain termed NT*. The chimeric protein displays highly efficient translation and is fully active in human cancer cells. Electron microscopy and mass spectrometry reveal that the protein adopts a compact conformation. Molecular dynamics simulations and NMR measurements show that the disordered transactivation domain of p53 is wrapped around the NT* domain, resulting in a pseudo-globular structure. We find that expression of partially disordered cancer targets is similarly enhanced by fusion to NT*. In summary, we demonstrate that inducing co-translational folding via a molecular “spindle and thread” mechanism unblocks protein translation in vitro.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3891056

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Kaldmäe, M., Vosselman, T., Zhong, X., Lama, D., Chen, G., Saluri, M., Kronqvist, N., Wei Sau, J., Seng Ng, A., Ghadessy, F., Sabatier, P., Vojtesek, B., Sarr, M., Sahin, C., Österlund, N., Ilag, L., Väänänen, V., Sedimbi, S., Arsenain-Henriksson, M., Zubarev, R., Nilsson, L., Koeck, P., Rising, A., Abelein, A., Fritz, N., johansson, J., Lane, D. P., & Landreh, M.
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Cited by
2
References
0
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 'Spindle and Thread'-Mechanism Unblocks p53 Translation by Modulating N-Terminal Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.3891056
The paper
Kaldmäe, M., Vosselman, T., Zhong, X., Lama, D., Chen, G., Saluri, M., Kronqvist, N., Wei Sau, J., Seng Ng, A., Ghadessy, F., Sabatier, P., Vojtesek, B., Sarr, M., Sahin, C., Österlund, N., Ilag, L., Väänänen, V., Sedimbi, S., Arsenain-Henriksson, M., . . . Landreh, M. (2021). A 'Spindle and Thread'-Mechanism Unblocks p53 Translation by Modulating N-Terminal Disorder. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.