PreprintCited by 2Education during COVID-19 pandemicEducational Innovations and TechnologyE-Learning and COVID-19

E-Learning Engagement Gap During School Closures: Differences by Academic Performance

Open access
Amer-Mestre, Josep, Ayarza-Astigarraga, Alaitz, Lopes, Marta C·2022·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Using data from Google Trends in Italy, we study the differences in online learning usage due to the COVID-19 pandemic by regional academic performance. With 2016 to 2020 data, we find that during the first lockdown, regions with a previously lower academic performance actively increased their searches more in Google about e-learning tools than their counterparts, higher-performing regions. Analysing school administrative and survey data before the pandemic, we find that both teachers and students in lower performing regions were using no less e-learning tools than higher performing ones. These two findings suggest that the COVID-19 shock widened the e-learning usage gap between academically lower and higher-performing regions. We next exploit the regional variation in school closure mandates introduced in the 2020/2021 academic year. After corroborating that Google Trends provides a good measure of the change in e-learning usage, we report that the patterns detected after the first lockdown were no longer present in the subsequent academic year. Our analysis suggests that in the new school year regions with different previous academic performance had the same response in terms of online learning usage when faced with stricter school closures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3968074

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 2

Authors
Amer-Mestre, J., Ayarza-Astigarraga, A., & Lopes, M. C.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • European University Institute (IT)
  • IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Corresponding author
Lopes, Marta C
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210729319
Cited by
2
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
online learning, school closures, COVID-19 pandemic, academic performance, educational inequality, Google Trends, Italy, regional variation, teachers and students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review