Losing is Optional: Retail Option Trading and Earnings Announcement Volatility
Open accessAbstract
We document the growth of retail options trading and provide evidence that retail investors are drawn to options by anticipated spikes in volatility. Retail investors purchase options in a concentrated fashion before earnings announcements, particularly those with greater expected abnormal volatility. In doing so, retail investors display a trio of wealth-depleting behaviors: they overpay for options relative to realized volatility, incur enormous bid-ask spreads, and sluggishly respond to announcements. These translate to retail losses of 5-to-9% on average, and 10-to-14% for high expected volatility announcements. Market makers are the primary beneficiaries, particularly in recent years coinciding with the COVID pandemic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The aggregate trading performance of retail option traders is poor, particularly around earnings announcements, in short-term options, and when using complex option strategies.
“These concerns seem justified in light of recent academic papers which have shown that the aggregate trading performance of retail option traders is poor, particularly around earnings announcements (de Silva, Smith, and So, 2022), in shortterm options (Beckmeyer, Branger, and Gayda, 2023), and when using complex option strategies (Naranjo, Nimalendran, and Wu, 2022).”
From Striking Out: Biases and Losses of Retail Option Traders (2024) · cites this paper as de Silva, Smith, and So, 2022
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524 · see citing works
Retail Trading in Options and the Rise of the Big Three Wholesalers
BRYZGALOVA, S., PAVLOVA, A., & SIKORSKAYA, T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13285 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Why do (some) households trade so much?
Linnainmaa, J. T. (2011) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr009 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Retail Trading in Options and the Rise of the Big Three Wholesalers
BRYZGALOVA, S., PAVLOVA, A., & SIKORSKAYA, T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13285 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Striking Out: Biases and Losses of Retail Option Traders
Pitkäjärvi, A., & Vacca, M. (2024) · SSRN Working Paper · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4848713 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Silva, T., Smith, K., & So, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225965695
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Stochastic processes and financial applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Keywords
- earnings announcements, abnormal volatility, retail investor behavior, option pricing, bid-ask spread, market makers, COVID-19 pandemic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review