Shear Behavior of Silty Clay Soil Stabilized with Calcium Carbide Residue
Open accessAbstract
Since clayey soils contain a large amount of natural Pozzolanic materials, calcium carbide residue (CCR) material can be used as a stabilizer to improve their strength. In this research we conducted a total of 60 direct shear tests, to evaluate the shear behavior of the CCR-stabilized clay soil. In tests, the variable parameters were CCR contents (3%, 7%, 10% and 13%), curing times (CT) (7, 14, 28 and 60 days) and vertical stress values (0.50, 1.00 and 1.50 kg/cm 2 ). Also some microstructural analysis was performed in clayey soil, CCR and the CCR-clay soil mixture to study the variation microstructural of this combination. To evaluate the shear behavior of the soil, the effect of the CCR and CT on the important parameters such as improvement factor (IF), cohesion (c) and internal friction angle (φ) of the soil has been investigated. The results showed that by adding the CCR to the natural CL-ML soil increases shear stress (τ), shear strain, c, φ and plasticity of the soil. At CT=28 days, adding the 3% CCR to clayey soil caused increasing 422% and 22% in the c and φ values, respectively. The results demonstrated that the CCR and CT variations are more effective on c values rather than φ values. Microstructural analysis demonstrated that adding CCR to clayey soil and CT=28 days decreases crystalline phases, increases amorphous phases, and forms secondary products. The findings of this research indicate that the use of the CCR as a waste material can be used in the stabilization of fine-grained soils in road construction, which causes a significant increase in the shear strength of the soil and a significant reduction in the emission of carbon dioxide in nature.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51
- Authors
- Amanian, A., & Tabaroei, A.
- Affiliations
- Yazd University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Tabaroei, Abdollah
- ORCID
- Tabaroei, Abdollah
- Venue
- Case Studies in Construction Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- e06416-e06416
- ISSN
- 2214-5095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7202293123
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Case Studies in Construction Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
- Keywords
- calcium carbide residue, soil stabilization, silty clay, direct shear strength, curing time, cohesion, internal friction angle, microstructure, amorphous phase, secondary products, waste reuse, road construction, CO2 emission reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review