Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Pop Music Creation: A Real Music Production Perspective
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across TTA research, systems still struggle to maintain musical coherence over longer passages and keep generated form aligned with the user's intentions.
“Across TTA research, systems still struggle to maintain musical coherence over longer passages and keep generated form aligned with the user's intentions (Chen et al., 2024; Fu et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2025; Zhu et al., 2023).”
From AI-assisted literary-to-song adaptation: a practice-based study of literary interpretation in a text-to-audio workflow (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Zhang, N., Yan, J., & Briot, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Ning
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381886802
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Keywords
- AI-generated music, pop music production, music generation, melody generation, arrangements, sound synthesis, MusicGen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
