The DOI matches its Crossref record; 0 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insights from Teaching with AI: How ChatGPT Can Enhance Experiential Learning and Assist Instructors
Open accessAbstract
We explore the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI), specifically ChatGPT, in the classroom to support learning and complement assignment evaluations. Incorporated into a Spring 2023 course, we assessed the tool from students' and instructor's perspectives. Initial student hesitancy was overcome as the technology's integration enhanced learning experiences and equipped them with valuable skills for future careers, leading to strong student advocacy for AI inclusion in curricula. From the grading perspective, the AI's stricter evaluations and occasional overemphasis on keyword inclusion highlighted areas of improvement. Despite this, AI has the potential of supplementing human grading, boosting fairness and consistency. Our experience emphasizes AI's potential in education, the need for teaching these non-trivial skills, and important areas for consideration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, GenAI tools can also enhance student learning by aiding in preparing for and writing assignments and improving their quality and narratives [9].”
From Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Untitled work
Ai (2023) · Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts
UnresolvedUntitled work
Katz, D. M. (n.d.) · GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam
UnresolvedUntitled work
Terwiesch, C. (2023) · Would Chat GPT Get a Wharton MBA? New White Paper By Christian Terwiesch
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14010083 · Cited by 193
“Nevertheless, GenAI tools can also enhance student learning by aiding in preparing for and writing assignments and improving their quality and narratives [9].”
BackgroundSalinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-12-2023-0236 · Cited by 84
Su, M.-C., Lin, L.-E., Lin, L.-H., & Chen, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104717 · Cited by 52
The Role of ChatGPT in Education: Applications, Challenges: Insights From a Systematic Review
Dimeli, M., & Κώστας, Α. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/5422 · Cited by 57
Al‐Fattal, A. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/02734753251356691 · Cited by 28
“As an example, Albert and Li (2023) reported that students using ChatGPT during experiential learning exercises were exposed to unfamiliar strategic options, prompting deeper consideration of marketing and business dilemmas.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, D., & Li, T.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Albert, Daniel
- ORCID
- Albert, Daniel
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385237076
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, generative AI in education, experiential learning, AI-assisted grading, student perceptions of AI, teacher perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights from Teaching with AI: How ChatGPT Can Enhance Experiential Learning and Assist Instructors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.4516801
- The paper
- Albert, D., & Li, T. (2023). Insights from Teaching with AI: How ChatGPT Can Enhance Experiential Learning and Assist Instructors. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4516801
