Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Novelli, Claudio, Hacker, Philipp, Morley, Jessica, Trondal, Jarle, Floridi, Luciano·2024
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.4817755

Preprint — published as 10.1017/err.2024.57

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU´s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) will be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative model of governance, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfilment of the legislation. Taken together, the article explores how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasizing how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4817755

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Supranational and national bodies involved in the implementation and enforcement of the AIA.
Figure 1 Supranational and national bodies involved in the implementation and enforcement of the AIA.CC-BY-SA · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Chris Ansell, 2024, Robust Governance in Turbulent Times, 10.1017/9781009433006 · DOI
  2. Tobias Bach, 2010, Animals in the Administrative Zoo: Organizational Change and Agency Autonomy in Germany, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 443, 10.1177/0020852310372448 · doi:10.1177/0020852310372448
  3. Arthur Benz, 2021. A Research Agenda for Multilevel Governance. Elgar Research Agendas. Elgar
  4. 2023, Key Takeaways from the Irish DPC and EDPB Decisions on Facebook Data Transfers, DPC Decision, EU User Data, Bird&Bird
  5. Gijs Brandsma, 2017, Controlling the EU Executive?: The Politics of Delegation in the European Union, 10.1093/oso/9780198767909.001.0001 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198767909.001.0001
  6. Madalena Busuioc, 2012, Wielders of supranational power? The administrative behaviour of the heads of European Union agencies, The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union
  7. Aude Cefaliello, 2022, Offering False Security: How the Draft Artificial Intelligence Act Undermines Fundamental Workers Rights, European Labour Law Journal, 13, 542, 10.1177/20319525221114474 · DOI
  8. Merijn Chamon, 2016, EU Agencies: Legal and Political Limits to the Transformation of the EU Administration, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784487.001.0001 · DOI
  9. Foo Chee, 2023, Amazon Makes First Big Tech Challenge to EU Online Content Rules, Technology
  10. P Craig, 2018, Delegated and Implementing Acts. 1st ed
  11. Renaud Dehousse, 2003, Comitology: Who Watches the Watchmen?, Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 798, 10.1080/1350176032000124096 · DOI
  12. Georgios Dimitropoulos, 2016, Learning and the Law: Improving Behavioral Regulation from an International and Comparative Perspective, Journal of Law and Policy, 25, 473
  13. Elena - Dumitrescu, 2021, Machine Learning or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let's Get the Best of Both Worlds'. SSRN Scholarly Paper
  14. Morten Egeberg, 2009, Why strong coordination at one level of government is incompatible with strong coordination across levels (and how to live with it, Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy. Effects of Agencification, 22, 579
  15. Morten Egeberg, 2017, Researching European Union agencies: What have we learned (and where to go from here, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55, 675, 10.1111/jcms.12525 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Morten Egeberg, 2015, National Administrative Sovereignty, 173
  17. Morten Egeberg, 2006, Multilevel Union Administration, 10.1057/9780230502222 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2021, The EU Artificial Intelligence Act and Access to Justice
  19. Jean-Pierre Galland, 2013, The Difficulties of Regulating Markets and Risks in Europe through Notified Bodies, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4, 365, 10.1017/S1867299X00002634 · DOI
  20. Philipp Hacker, 2023, Regulating ChatGPT and Other Large Generative AI Models, Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1112, 10.1145/3593013.3594067 · DOI · Paper page
  21. FAccT '23
  22. 2020, Responsible A.I.-Based Credit Scoring -A Legal Framework, Robert. 2007 Sovereignty. The Evolution of an Idea, 31
  23. Shuming Ma, 2024, The Era of 1-Bit LLMs: All Large Language Models Are in 1.58 Bits
  24. Anna Marcoulli, 2023, Recent Trends and Developments in the Case Law of EU Courts on Access to Documents, ERA Forum, 23, 477, 10.1007/s12027-023-00735-y · doi:10.1007/s12027-023-00735-y
  25. Jessica Morley, 2022, Governing Data and Artificial Intelligence for Health Care: Developing an International Understanding, JMIR Formative Research, 6
  26. Jessica Morley, 2020, From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices, Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2141, 10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Karl Muth, 2019, The Potential and Limits of Administrative Sovereignty'. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration
  28. Karl Muth, 2019, Oxford Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration
  29. Claudio Novelli, 2023, Taking AI Risks Seriously: A New Assessment Model for the AI Act'. AI & SOCIETY
  30. 2024, AI Risk Assessment: A Scenario-Based, Proportional Methodology for the AI Act, Digital Society, 3
  31. Claudio Novelli, 2024, Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity'. SSRN Scholarly Paper
  32. Claudio Novelli, 2023, Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works, AI & SOCIETY
  33. Laura Salzano, 2023, Mysteriousness by Design: The Case of Frontex and the Regulation on Public Access to Documents'. SSRN Scholarly Paper
  34. Miroslava Scholten, 2014, The Limits of Agencification in the European Union', German Law Journal, 15, 1223, 10.1017/S2071832200019350 · DOI
  35. Julia Tar, 2024, Implementing Tech Rulebooks Should Be Top Digital Policy Priority, EU Countries Urge, Www.Euractiv.Com
  36. Sandra Thiel, 2012, Comparing Agencies across Countries, Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, 18, 10.1057/9780230359512_2 · DOI
  37. Jarle Trondal, 2010, An Emergent European Executive Order, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579426.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Jarle Trondal, 2023, Governing the Contemporary Administrative State, 10.1007/978-3-031-28008-5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28008-5
  39. Sandra Thiel, 2012, Comparing agencies across countries, Government Agencies, 10.1057/9780230359512_2 · DOI
  40. Koen Verhoest, 2018, Agencification in Europe, The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, 327, 10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_17 · DOI
  41. Koen Verhoest, 2018, Agencification in Europe, The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, 327, 10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_17 · DOI
  42. Kerstin N Vokinger, 2021, Regulating AI in Medicine in the United States and Europe', Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 738, 10.1038/s42256-021-00386-z · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Novelli, C., Hacker, P., Morley, J., Trondal, J., & Floridi, L.
ORCID
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.4817755
Cited by
21
References
0
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.4817755
The paper
Novelli, C., Hacker, P., Morley, J., Trondal, J., & Floridi, L. (2024). A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4817755

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.