PreprintCited by 10Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsEconomic and Fiscal StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Online gambling policy effects on tax revenue and irresponsible gambling

Open access
Taylor, Wayne, McCarthy, Daniel, Wilbur, Kenneth C.·2024·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4856684

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one study of 700,000 adults who gamble, 96% lost money from online gambling.

    “In one study of 700,000 adults who gamble, 96% lost money from online gambling.352”
  • Lower income individuals are more likely to experience harms from online gambling.

    “Lower income individuals are more likely to experience harms from online gambling.352”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, W., McCarthy, D., & Wilbur, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Wilbur, Kenneth C.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399499154
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
sports betting legalization, online gambling, problem gambling, income heterogeneity, alcohol consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review