PreprintCited by 3Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMisinformation and Its Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Challenging the Machinery of Generative AI with Fact-Checking: Ontology-Driven Biological Graphs for Verifying Human Disease-Gene Links

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4888506

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 2013, Gene ontology annotations and resources, 41
  2. 2020, Query rewriting for ontology-mediated conditional answers
  3. Daniel Barrell, 2009, The goa database in 2009 -an integrated gene ontology annotation resource, Nucleic Acids Research, 37
  4. Evelyn Camon, 2003, The gene ontology annotation (goa) project: Implementation of go in swiss-prot, trembl, and interpro
  5. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, 2015, Computational fact checking from knowledge networks, PloS one, 10
  6. Rion Brattig Correia, 2016, Monitoring potential drug interactions and reactions via network analysis of instagram user timelines, Biocomputing 2016: Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium, 492, 10.1142/9789814749411_0045 · DOI
  7. Li Fang, 2021, Grndb: decoding the gene regulatory networks in diverse human and mouse conditions, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, 97, 10.1093/nar/gkaa995 · DOI
  8. Alessandro Ahmed Abdeen Hamed, 2024, Fact-checking generative ai: Ontology-driven biological graphs for disease-gene link verification, Computational Science -ICCS 2024, 130
  9. Philipp Hofer, 2017, Semiautomated annotation of biobank data using standard medical terminologies in a graph database, 228
  10. Rachael P Huntley, 2015, The goa database: Gene ontology annotation updates for, Nucleic Acids Research
  11. Yasmin Samuel Kerrien, 2007, Saransh Khandelwal and Dhananjay Kumar. Computational fact validation from knowledge graph using structured and unstructured information, Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD, 35, 204
  12. Ji-Seong Kim, 2021, Fact checking in knowledge graphs by logical consistency, Semantic Web Journal
  13. Jiseong Kim, 2020, Unsupervised fact checking by counter-weighted positive and negative evidential paths in a knowledge graph, Proceedings of the 28th international conference on computational linguistics
  14. Yunjin Li, 2021, Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals dynamic alternative splicing and gene regulatory networks among pancreatic islets, Science China Life Sciences, 64, 174, 10.1007/s11427-020-1711-x · DOI
  15. Panpan Lin, 2018, Fact checking in knowledge graphs with ontological subgraph patterns, Data Science and Engineering, 3, 341, 10.1007/s41019-018-0082-4 · DOI
  16. Peng Lin, 2018, Discovering graph patterns for fact checking in knowledge graphs, International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 783
  17. Peng Lin, 2018, Discovering graph patterns for fact checking in knowledge graphs, International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 783
  18. Peng Lin, 2019, Discovering patterns for fact checking in knowledge graphs, Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 11, 1, 10.1145/3286488 · DOI
  19. Peng Lin, 2019, Discovering patterns for fact checking in knowledge graphs, Journal of Data and Information Quality
  20. Peng Lin, 2017, Automatic {Fact} {Checking} for {Knowledge} {Graphs}: {An} {Experimental} {Study}, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 11
  21. Lihui Liu, 2021, Kompare: A knowledge graph comparative reasoning system, Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
  22. Weichen Luo, 2021, Fact checking on knowledge graphs, Data Science for Fake News: Surveys and Perspectives, 149
  23. Paolo Mengoni, 2022, Empowering covid-19 fact-checking with extended knowledge graphs, International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, 138
  24. Jack Minker, 1982, On indefinite databases and the closed world assumption, LNCS, 138
  25. Openai, 2023, Conversational ai assistant. OpenAI Platform
  26. T�o Orthlieb, 2021, Checking method for fake news to avoid the twitter effect, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 17th International Conference, ITS 2021, Virtual Event, 17, 68, 10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_8 · DOI
  27. Teodor C Przymusinski, 1989, An algorithm to compute circumscription, Artificial Intelligence, 38
  28. Umair Qudus, 2022, Hybridfc: A hybrid factchecking approach for knowledge graphs, International Semantic Web Conference, 13489
  29. Kishore Gautam, 2023, Fakekg: A knowledge graph of fake claims for improving automated fact-checking (student abstract), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37
  30. Baoxu Shi, 2016, Discriminative predicate path mining for fact checking in knowledge graphs, Knowledge-Based Systems, 104
  31. Baoxu Shi, 2017, Proje: Embedding projection for knowledge graph completion, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'17, 1236
  32. Prashant Shiralkar, 2017, Finding streams in knowledge graphs to support fact checking, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 10.1109/ICDM.2017.105 · DOI
  33. Tiago Simas, 2015, Distance closures on complex networks, Network Science, 3, 227, 10.1017/nws.2015.11 · DOI
  34. Adama Sow, 2019, Enrichment of medical ontologies from textual clinical reports: Towards improving linking human diseases and signs, 296
  35. Damian Szklarczyk, 2021, The string database in 2021: customizable proteinprotein networks, and functional characterization of useruploaded gene/measurement sets, Nucleic acids research, 49, 605, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Andon Tchechmedjiev, 2019, Claimskg: A knowledge graph of fact-checked claims, The Semantic Web -ISWC 2019, 11779, 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_20 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Antonio Torralba, 2011, Unbiased look at dataset bias
  38. Nikhita Vedula, 2021, Face-keg: Fact checking explained using knowledge graphs, Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 526, 10.1145/3437963.3441828 · DOI
  39. Shuai Wang, 2022, Knowledge structure driven prototype learning and verification for fact checking, Knowledge-Based Systems, 238
  40. Shuai Wang, 2020, A kg-based enhancement framework for fact checking using category information, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), 1
  41. Linyao Yang, 2023, Chatgpt is not enough: Enhancing large language models with knowledge graphs for fact-aware language modeling
  42. Biru Zhu, 2021, Knowledge enhanced fact checking and verification, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, 29

Metadata

Authors
Hamed, A. A., Crimi, A., Lee, B. S., & Misiak, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • AGH University of Krakow (PL)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hamed, Ahmed Abdeen
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400476807
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
ChatGPT, biological networks, PubMed abstracts, protein-protein interaction network, gene regulatory networks, IntAct

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review