The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monopsony Power and Poverty: The Consequences of Walmart Supercenter Openings
Open accessAbstract
Prior research suggests that Walmart Supercenters exert substantial power over the low-wage labor market, though the consequences of Supercenter openings on household incomes and public finances are less clear. This study uses restricted-access Panel Study of Income Dynamics data from 1970 to 2019 to study how Walmart Supercenter openings affect poverty, tax liabilities, and receipt of income transfers. Using a stacked difference-in-differences approach, we find that the opening of a Supercenter leads to a 2 percentage point (16%) increase in poverty. This increase is channeled through declining annual earnings and persists for 10 years following the Supercenter's entry. Increases in poverty are particularly strong for younger and less-educated adults, and for adults with pre-treatment incomes below the national median. Moreover, Walmart Supercenter openings lead to a $200 (or 16%) per household per year increase in government income transfers received, and a $920 (or 5%) per household per year decrease in tax revenues.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several recent studies have also found that Walmart ' s wage-setting and buyer power have affected local labor markets in negative ways where Supercenters have been established, for example by putting downward pressure on wages (Wiltshire 2023; Lehner et al. 2024).”
From Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems (2025) · cites this paper as Lehner et al. 2024
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems
Clapp, J., Vriezen, R., Laila, A., Conti, C., Gordon, L., Hicks, C., & Rao, N. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102897 · Cited by 64
Populist Trade Economics and the Political Economy of PopulismPreprint
Ciuriak, D. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5043675 · Cited by 2
The effects of minimum wage regulation in inter‐regional oligopoly competition
Matsushima, N., Nishikawa, K., & Qiu, J. (2026) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/coep.70050
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehner, L., Parolin, Z., Pignatti, C., & Schmitt, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Bocconi University (IT)
- International Labour Organization (CH)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lehner, Lukas
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403104298
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- monopsony power, poverty, low-wage labor market, household income, tax revenue, retail store opening, earnings decline, Panel Study of Income Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monopsony Power and Poverty: The Consequences of Walmart Supercenter Openings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2139/ssrn.4975258
- The paper
- Lehner, L., Parolin, Z., Pignatti, C., & Schmitt, R. (2024). Monopsony Power and Poverty: The Consequences of Walmart Supercenter Openings. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975258