Generative AI and Labor Market Matching Efficiency
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algorithmic assistance on job application essays can increase hiring rates significantly.
“For the latter, algorithmic assistance on job application essays can increase hiring rates significantly (Wiles et al. 2025).”
From The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Wiles et al. 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents
Shahidi, P., Rusak, G., Manning, B., Fradkin, A., & Horton, J. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w34468 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wiles, E., & Horton, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wiles, Emma
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409472832
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Keywords
- generative AI, job matching, job advertisements, market efficiency, negative externalities, welfare effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
