The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Working Paper 26-021
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The need for interpretability tools such as chain-of-thought monitoring demonstrates that developers are working with systems whose internal mechanisms they do not fully comprehend.
“The need for interpretability tools such as chain-of-thought monitoring demonstrates that developers are working with systems whose internal mechanisms they do not fully comprehend. 19”
From The hidden functions of sycophancy in AI systems: steering, consistency, and cognitive dependency (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz, H., Kellogg, K. C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2026) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2025.21838 · Cited by 1,189
Self-citationThe hidden functions of sycophancy in AI systems: steering, consistency, and cognitive dependency
Jacobowitz, S. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02993-z · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Randazzo, S., Joshi, A., Kellogg, K., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Dell'Acqua, F., & Lakhani, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Randazzo, Steven
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4415673617
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
