The Consequences of Cellphone Restrictions in Classrooms
Open accessAbstract
We examine teacher-level cellphone permissiveness in a setting where phones are often used for instructional support and teachers retain discretion over classroom cellphone use. Using linked Chilean administrative and survey data, we exploit variation in cellphone policy within teachers across cohorts and within students across subjects. Greater restrictiveness modestly reduces eighth graders' cellphone use in class, but not tenth graders'. It also lowers eighth graders' self-perceived academic capability, with no detectable effects on test scores. These findings inform settings, more common in low- and middle-income countries, involving uneven classroom enforcement within schools and where phones serve as low-cost instructional tools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shi and Villarroel (2026) found that classroom-level restrictions in Chile modestly reduced in-class phone use but did not measurably improve test scores.
“In related work,Shi and Villarroel (2026) find that classroom-level restrictions in Chile modestly reduced in-class phone use but did not measurably improve test scores.”
From The Effects of School Phone Bans: National Evidence from Lockable Pouches (2026) · cites this paper as Shi and Villarroel (2026)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10
- Authors
- Shi, Y., & Villarroel, F.
- ORCID
- Shi, Ying
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7131280387
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Brown Digital Repository
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- mobile devices, educational technology policy, student behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review