University of California System Satisfactory Academic Progress Web Accessibility Report
Open accessAbstract
This report examines the web accessibility of Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) webpages across nine University of California institutions. In September 2026, each publicly available SAP webpage was evaluated using the WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool, followed by manual inspection of webpage code to verify identified errors and reduce false positives. Findings were interpreted in relation to WCAG 2.1 Level A and Level AA accessibility requirements. Accessibility errors varied across campuses, with very low color contrast emerging as the most common system-wide issue. Seven of the nine institutions had at least one contrast-related error, while UC Irvine and UC Santa Barbara had no identified errors in the categories examined. UC Berkeley also exhibited multiple missing form labels, highlighting the importance of accessible names and programmatic relationships for interactive elements. Other error types were comparatively uncommon. Overall, the findings indicate that UC SAP webpages generally contained relatively few accessibility barriers, but recurring issues related to contrast and form controls remain important for remediation. The report recommends that financial aid practitioners collaborate with campus IT, web development, and accessibility personnel to correct verified errors, review interactive elements, and establish recurring accessibility audits so that SAP information remains accessible to students using assistive technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
- Authors
- Taylor, Z.
- ORCID
- Taylor, Zachary
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7211950301
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
- Keywords
- web accessibility, satisfactory academic progress, financial aid, University of California, WCAG 2.1, color contrast, assistive technology, accessibility audit
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review