The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Great Depression as a Credit Boom Gone Wrong
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Does the “New Economy” Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past?
Gordon, R. J. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.49 · Cited by 1,206
Uncontrolled Land Development and the Duration of the Depression in the United States
Field, A. J. (1992) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700011906 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Credit Booms Gone Bust: Monetary Policy, Leverage Cycles and Financial Crises, 1870-2008
Schularick, M., & Taylor, A. (2009) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15512 · Cited by 697
Whither Monetary and Financial Stability? The Implications of Evolving Policy Regimes
Borio, C. E. V., & White, W. R. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.901387 · Cited by 368
The double bubble at the turn of the century: technological roots and structural implications
Perez, C. (2009) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bep028 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichengreen, B., & Mitchener, K. J.
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124776301
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
