Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,384

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance

Martin, Alvin, Doddington, George, Kamm, Terri, Ordowski, Mark, Przybocki, Mark·1997·5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997)

Abstract

We introduce the DET Curve as a means of representing performance on detection tasks that involve a tradeoff of error types. We discuss why we prefer it to the traditional ROC Curve and offer several examples of its use in speaker recognition and language recognition. We explain why it is likely to produce approximately linear curves. We also note special points that may be included on these curves, how they are used with multiple targets, and possible further applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/eurospeech.1997-504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,384

Metadata

Authors
Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M., & Przybocki, M.
Venue
5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997)
Publisher
ISCA
Published
1997-09-22
Pages
1895-1898
OpenAlex
W1586405805
Cited by
1,384
References
0
FWCI
14.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/eurospeech.1997-504
The paper
Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M., & Przybocki, M. (1997). The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997). https://doi.org/10.21437/eurospeech.1997-504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.