Cited by 26Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorSpeech Recognition and SynthesisUsability and User Interface Design

ASR satisficing: the effects of ASR accuracy on speech retrieval

Stark, Litza, Whittaker, Steve, Hirschberg, Julia·2000·6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000)

Abstract

We examine how differences in the accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition transcripts affect users' ability to use these in tasks requiring the retrieval of speech "documents". We compare performance measures, processing strategies, and preference data for subjects using transcripts and speech data to perform a series of relevance judgment and summary tasks on transcripts with different levels of accuracy. Results show effects for transcript quality on solution accuracy, time to solution, amount of speech played for the task, likelihood of subjects abandoning use of a transcript, and subject perceptions of task difficulty, transcript utility, readability, and comprehensibility. 1. INTRODUCTION Research on Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) generally assumes perfect transcription accuracy to be its holy grail. The more accurately a system can transcribe an utterance, the better that system performs (modulo time factors) Recently this assumption is being challenged, however. Different...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/icslp.2000-720

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stark, L., Whittaker, S., & Hirschberg, J.
Venue
6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000)
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2000-10-16
Pages
vol. 3, 1069-1072-0
OpenAlex
W164174688
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
speech recognition, transcription accuracy, speech retrieval, relevance assessment, user preferences, task abandonment, comprehensibility, task difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review