The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions
Abstract
This paper describes a database designed to evaluate the performance of speech recognition algorithms in noisy conditions. The database may either be used to measure frontend feature extraction algorithms, using a defined HMM recognition back-end, or complete recognition systems. The source speech for this database is the TIdigits, consisting of connected digits task spoken by American English talkers (downsampled to 8kHz). A selection of 8 different real-world noises have been added to the speech over a range of signal to noise ratios with controlled filtering of the speech and noise. The framework was prepared as a contribution to the ETSI STQ-AURORA DSR Working Group[1]. Aurora is developing standards for Distributed Speech Recognition (DSR) where the speech analysis is done in the telecommunication terminal and the recognition at a central location in the telecom network. The framework is currently being used to evaluate alternative proposals for front-end feature extraction. The database has been made publicly available through ELRA so that other speech researchers to evaluate and compare the performance of noise robust algorithms. Recognition results will be presented for the first standard DSR feature extraction scheme based on a cepstral analysis. 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Varga, A., & Steeneken, H. J. M. (1993) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/0167-6393(93)90095-3 · Cited by 2,105
A database for speaker-independent digit recognition
Leonard, R. (2005) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1984.1172716 · Cited by 536
Cited by
Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control
Duan, Y., Chen, X., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.06778 · Cited by 1,114
The third ‘CHiME’ speech separation and recognition challenge: Dataset, task and baselines
Barker, J., Marxer, R., Vincent, E., & Watanabe, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru.2015.7404837 · Cited by 641
Analysis of CNN-based speech recognition system using raw speech as input
Palaz, D., Magimai-Doss, M., & Collobert, R. (2015) · Interspeech 2015 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2015-3 · Cited by 288
Mysore, G. J. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2014.2379648 · Cited by 81
(2023) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00627 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearce, D., & Hirsch, H.-G.
- Venue
- 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000)
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2000-10-16
- Pages
- vol. 4, 29-32
- OpenAlex
- W2151484683
- Cited by
- 1,772
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/icslp.2000-743
- The paper
- Pearce, D., & Hirsch, H.-G. (2000). The aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000). https://doi.org/10.21437/icslp.2000-743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.