The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Within-class covariance normalization for SVM-based speaker recognition
Abstract
This paper extends the within-class covariance normalization (WCCN) technique described in [1, 2] for training generalized linear kernels. We describe a practical procedure for applying WCCN to an SVM-based speaker recognition system where the input feature vectors reside in a high-dimensional space. Our ap-proach involves using principal component analysis (PCA) to split the original feature space into two subspaces: a low-dimensional “PCA space ” and a high-dimensional “PCA-complement space.” After performing WCCN in the PCA space, we concatenate the resulting feature vectors with a weighted version of their PCA-complements. When applied to a state-of-the-art MLLR-SVM speaker recognition system, this approach achieves improvements of up to 22 % in EER and 28 % in minimum decision cost function (DCF) over our previous baseline. We also achieve substantial im-provements over an MLLR-SVM system that performs WCCN in the PCA space but discards the PCA-complement. Index Terms: kernel machines, support vector machines, feature normalization, generalized linear kernels, speaker recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
Front-End Factor Analysis for Speaker Verification
Dehak, N., Kenny, P. J., Dehak, R., Dumouchel, P., & Ouellet, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2010.2064307 · Cited by 3,549
Spoofing and countermeasures for speaker verification: A survey
Wu, Z., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Yamagishi, J., Alegre, F., & Li, H. (2015) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.005 · Cited by 601
ASVspoof 2019: A large-scale public database of synthesized, converted and replayed speech
Wang, X., Yamagishi, J., Todisco, M., Delgado, H., Nautsch, A., Evans, N., Sahidullah, M., Vestman, V., Kinnunen, T., Lee, K. A., et al. (2020) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101114 · Cited by 505
A review of deep learning techniques for speech processing
Mehrish, A., Majumder, N., Bharadwaj, R., Mihalcea, R., & Poria, S. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101869 · Cited by 389
ASVspoof: The Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Countermeasures Challenge
Wu, Z., Yamagishi, J., Kinnunen, T., Hanilci, C., Sahidullah, M., Sizov, A., Evans, N., Todisco, M., & Delgado, H. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2017.2671435 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatch, A. O., Kajarekar, S., & Stolcke, A.
- Venue
- Interspeech 2006
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2006-09-17
- Pages
- paper 1874-Wed1A1O.5-0
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1916834241
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.