The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distant speech recognition in a smart home: comparison of several multisource ASRs in realistic conditions
Abstract
While the smart home domain has become a major field of application of ICT to improve support and wellness of people in loss of autonomy, speech technology in smart home has, comparatively to other ICTs, received limited attention.This paper presents the SWEET-HOME project whose aim is to make it possible for frail persons to control their domestic environment through voice interfaces.Several state-of-the-art and novel ASR techniques were evaluated on realistic data acquired in a multiroom smart home.This distant speech French corpus was recorded with 21 speakers playing scenarios including activities of daily living in a smart home equipped with several microphones.Techniques acting at the decoding stage and using a priori knowledge such as DDA give better results (WER=8.8%,Domotic F-measure=96.8%)than the baseline (WER=18.3%,Domotic F-measure=89.2%)and other approaches.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The final Language Model combination of generic LM (10% weight) and specialized LM (90% weight) has been shown to lead to low Word Error Rate for domain specific applications.
“This weighting has been shown to lead to low Word Error Rate (WER) 3 (Morris et al., 2004) for domain specific applications (Lecouteux et al., 2011).”
From Making Emergency Calls More Accessible to Older Adults Through a Hands-free Speech Interface in the House (2019) · cites this paper as Lecouteux et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Speech Input from Older Users in Smart Environments: Challenges and Perspectives
Vipperla, R., Wolters, M., Georgila, K., & Renals, S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_14 · Cited by 37
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., & Meillon, B. (2013) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5 · Cited by 421
Self-citationVacher, M., Caffiau, S., Portet, F., Meillon, B., Roux, C., Elias, E., Lecouteux, B., & Chahuara, P. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/2738047 · Cited by 73
Self-citationVacher, M., Aman, F., Rossato, S., Portet, F., & Lecouteux, B. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3310132 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lecouteux, B., Vacher, M., & Portet, F.
- Affiliations
- Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
- Venue
- Interspeech 2011
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2011-08-27
- Pages
- 2273-2276
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2398131491
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- distant speech recognition, home automation, speech interfaces, activities of daily living, multi-microphone systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
