Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

1-bit stochastic gradient descent and its application to data-parallel distributed training of speech DNNs

Seide, Frank, Fu, Hao, Droppo, Jasha, Li, Gang, Yu, Dong·2014·Interspeech 2014

Abstract

We show empirically that in SGD training of deep neural networks, one can, at no or nearly no loss of accuracy, quantize the gradients aggressively—to but one bit per value—if the quantization error is carried forward across minibatches (error feedback). This size reduction makes it feasible to parallelize SGD through data-parallelism with fast processors like recent GPUs. We implement data-parallel deterministically distributed SGD by combining this finding with AdaGrad, automatic minibatch-size selection, double buffering, and model parallelism. Unexpectedly, quantization benefits AdaGrad, giving a small accuracy gain. For a typical Switchboard DNN with 46M parameters, we reach computation speeds of 27k frames per second (kfps) when using 2880 samples per minibatch, and 51kfps with 16k, on a server with 8 K20X GPUs. This corresponds to speed-ups over a single GPU of 3.6 and 6.3, respectively. 7 training passes over 309h of data complete in under 7h. A 160M-parameter model training processes 3300h of data in under 16h on 20 dual-GPU servers—a 10 times speed-up—albeit at a small accuracy loss.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2014-274

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Seide, F., Fu, H., Droppo, J., Li, G., & Yu, D.
Venue
Interspeech 2014
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2014-09-14
Pages
1058-1062
Cited by
443
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review