Progress and Prospects for Spoken Language Technology: What Ordinary People Think
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These factors often lead to an overestimation of VAs' abilities to understand and conduct human-like conversations, resulting in communication breakdowns.
“These factors often lead to an overestimation of VAs' abilities to understand and conduct human-like conversations, resulting in communication breakdowns [31, 35, 39].”
From Situated Understanding of Errors in Older Adults' Interactions with Voice Assistants: A Month-Long, In-Home Study (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping Perceptions of Humanness in Intelligent Personal Assistant Interaction
Doyle, P. R., Edwards, J., Dumbleton, O., Clark, L., & Cowan, B. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services · doi:10.1145/3338286.3340116 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
User interactions with “Alexa” in public academic space
Lopatovska, I., & Oropeza, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501034 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mahmood, A., Wang, J., & Huang, C.-M. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3796236 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“These factors often lead to an overestimation of VAs’ abilities resulting in communication breakdowns [37, 44, 51].”
- Authors
- Moore, R. K., Li, H., & Liao, S.-H.
- Venue
- Interspeech 2016
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2016-09-08
- Pages
- 3007-3011
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2516047653
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- speech technology, speech recognition, user perception, public attitudes, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
