Manual and Automatic Transcriptions in Dementia Detection from Speech
Abstract
As the population in developed countries is aging, larger numbers of people are at risk of developing dementia. In the near future there will be a need for time- and cost-efficient screening methods. Speech can be recorded and analyzed in this manner, and as speech and language are affected early on in the course of dementia, automatic speech processing can provide valuable support for such screening methods. We present two pipelines of feature extraction for dementia detection: the manual pipeline uses manual transcriptions while the fully automatic pipeline uses transcriptions created by automatic speech recognition (ASR). The acoustic and linguistic features that we extract need no language specific tools other than the ASR system. Using these two different feature extraction pipelines we automatically detect dementia. Our results show that the ASR system’s transcription quality is a good single feature and that the features extracted from automatic transcriptions perform similar or slightly better than the features extracted from the manual transcriptions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive skills affect the ability to operate a voice-controlled device.
“Cognitive skills were proven to affect the ability to operate a voice-controlled device by Weiner and colleagues [20].”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
In a prior study, the voice-controlled system showed a decrease in accuracy of speech recognition when the speakers suffered from Alzheimer disease or age-related cognitive decline.
“In this study, the voice-controlled system showed a decrease in accuracy of speech recognition when the speakers suffered from Alzheimer disease or age-related cognitive decline.”
From Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Weiner, J., Engelbart, M., & Schultz, T.
- Venue
- Interspeech 2017
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2017-08-20
- Pages
- 3117-3121
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2746614329
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- dementia detection, speech analysis, speech recognition, manual transcription, acoustic features, linguistic features, dementia screening, population aging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review