Spoken Content and Voice Factorization for Few-Shot Speaker Adaptation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing zero-shot TTS work leverages speaker adaptation and speaker encoding methods, requiring additional fine-tuning, complex pre-designed features, or heavy structure engineering.
“To tackle the zero-shot TTS problem, existing work leverages speaker adaptation [Chen et al., 2019, Wang et al., 2020] and speaker encoding [Arik et al., 2018, Casanova et al., 2022b] methods, requiring additional fine-tuning, complex pre-designed features, or heavy structure engineering.”
From Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizers (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizers
Wang, C., Chen, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, L., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Li, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.02111 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, T., Tao, J., Fu, R., Yi, J., Wen, Z., & Zhong, R.
- Venue
- Interspeech 2020
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2020-10-25
- Pages
- 796-800
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095035471
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- speaker adaptation, low-resource speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
