Cited by 40Speech Recognition and SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsSpeech and Audio Processing

LightHuBERT: Lightweight and Configurable Speech Representation Learning with Once-for-All Hidden-Unit BERT

Open access
Wang, Rui, Bai, Qibing, Ao, Junyi, Zhou, Long, Xiong, Zhixiang, Wei, Zhihua, Zhang, Yu, Ko, Tom +1 more·2022·Interspeech 2022

Abstract

Self-supervised speech representation learning has shown promising results in various speech processing tasks. However, the pre-trained models, e.g., HuBERT, are storage-intensive Transformers, limiting their scope of applications under low-resource settings. To this end, we propose LightHuBERT, a once-for-all Transformer compression framework, to find the desired architectures automatically by pruning structured parameters. More precisely, we create a Transformer-based supernet that is nested with thousands of weight-sharing subnets and design a two-stage distillation strategy to leverage the contextualized latent representations from HuBERT. Experiments on automatic speech recognition (ASR) and the SUPERB benchmark show the proposed LightHuBERT enables over $10^9$ architectures concerning the embedding dimension, attention dimension, head number, feed-forward network ratio, and network depth. LightHuBERT outperforms the original HuBERT on ASR and five SUPERB tasks with the HuBERT size, achieves comparable performance to the teacher model in most tasks with a reduction of 29% parameters, and obtains a $3.5\times$ compression ratio in three SUPERB tasks, e.g., automatic speaker verification, keyword spotting, and intent classification, with a slight accuracy loss. The code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/mechanicalsea/lighthubert.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2022-10269

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On several speech recognition tasks, the searched LightHuBERT achieves comparable predictive performance as the baseline teacher model HuBERT, even though it has 29% fewer model parameters.

    “On several speech recognition tasks, the searched LightHuBERT achieves comparable predictive performance as the baseline teacher model HuBERT [231], even though it has 29% fewer model parameters.”

    From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [206]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, R., Bai, Q., Ao, J., Zhou, L., Xiong, Z., Wei, Z., Zhang, Y., Ko, T., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • ByteDance (China) (CN)
Venue
Interspeech 2022
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2022-09-18
Pages
1686-1690
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224821750
Cited by
40
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976160, 61,976,158, 62076182, 61906137, 62076184)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
HuBERT, self-supervised speech representation learning, transformer compression, structured pruning, knowledge distillation, speech recognition, speaker verification, keyword spotting, intent classification, resource-limited settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review