The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pitch Accent Variation and the Interpretation of Rising and Falling Intonation in American English
Abstract
This study tests the division of labor in the meaning conveyed by pitch accents and edge tones in English intonation. In three perception studies, we investigate where the locus of the contrast between an assertive vs inquisitive interpretation resides. By doing so, we also gain insight into the role of potentially meaningful within-and between-category variation in the phonetic implementation of discrete intonational tunes. We find that the pitch accent does not contribute to assertive interpretation. Rather, the distinction between assertive and inquisitive interpretation is cued primarily by the final F0 of the pitch contour regardless of the pitch accent, but that increased overall pitch prominence may trigger a salient focus interpretation that interferes with judging assertiveness
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Sostarics, T., & Cole, J.
- ORCID
- Sostarics, Thomas
- Venue
- INTERSPEECH 2023
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2023-08-20
- Pages
- 97-101
- ISSN
- 2308-457X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385823295
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
- Keywords
- pitch accent, intonation, rising intonation, falling intonation, American English, prosody
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
