Cited by 338Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic and Audio Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audio

Open access

Abstract

Large-scale, weakly-supervised speech recognition models, such as Whisper, have demonstrated impressive results on speech recognition across domains and languages. However, their application to long audio transcription via buffered or sliding window approaches is prone to drifting, hallucination & repetition; and prohibits batched transcription due to their sequential nature. Further, timestamps corresponding each utterance are prone to inaccuracies and word-level timestamps are not available out-of-the-box. To overcome these challenges, we present WhisperX, a time-accurate speech recognition system with word-level timestamps utilising voice activity detection and forced phoneme alignment. In doing so, we demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on long-form transcription and word segmentation benchmarks. Additionally, we show that pre-segmenting audio with our proposed VAD Cut & Merge strategy improves transcription quality and enables a twelve-fold transcription speedup via batched inference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2023-78

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. H. Chen, H. Zhang, L. Wang, K. A. Lee, M. Liu, and J. Dang, "Self-supervised audio-visual speaker representation with co- meta learning," in ICASSP, 2023.
  2. S. Wisdom, E. Tzinis, H. Erdogan, R. Weiss, K. Wilson, and J. Hershey, "Unsupervised sound separation using mixture invari- ant training," NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 3846-3857, 2020.
  3. G. Gelly and J.-L. Gauvain, "Optimization of rnn-based speech activity detection," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 646-656, 2018.
  4. H. Bredin, R. Yin, J. M. Coria, G. Gelly, P. Korshunov, M. Lavechin, D. Fustes, H. Titeux, W. Bouaziz, and M.-P. Gill, "pyannote.audio: neural building blocks for speaker diarization," in ICASSP, 2020.
  5. Y.-Y. Yang, M. Hira, Z. Ni, A. Astafurov, C. Chen, C. Puhrsch, D. Pollack, D. Genzel, D. Greenberg, E. Z. Yang et al., "Torchau- dio: Building blocks for audio and speech processing," in ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2022, pp. 6982-6986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–338 of 338

Metadata

Authors
Bain, M., Huh, J., Han, T., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
INTERSPEECH 2023
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2023-08-20
Pages
4489-4493
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385822293
Cited by
337
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 134 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 15
FWCI
59.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T028572/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech transcription, voice activity detection, forced alignment, phone recognition, timestamping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review