The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Towards graceful turn management in human-agent interaction for people with cognitive impairments
Open accessAbstract
Yaghoubzadeh R, Kopp S. Towards graceful turn management in human-agent interaction for people with cognitive impairments. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT 2016). 2016: 26-31.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 10 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaghoubzadeh, R., & Kopp, S.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- ORCID
- Kopp, Stefan
- Venue
- 7th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT 2016)
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2016-09-13
- Pages
- 26-31
- ISSN
- 2411-9962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2609757796
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pub.uni-bielefeld.de
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ 16SV7271K)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- turn management, human-agent interaction, cognitive impairment, assistive technology, chatbots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review