The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating RNN-based speech enhancement methods for noise-robust Text-to-Speech
Abstract
The quality of text-to-speech (TTS) voices built from noisy speech is compromised. Enhancing the speech data before training has been shown to improve quality but voices built with clean speech are still preferred. In this paper we investigate two different approaches for speech enhancement to train TTS systems. In both approaches we train a recursive neural network (RNN) to map acoustic features extracted from noisy speech to features describing clean speech. The enhanced data is then used to train the TTS acoustic model. In one approach we use the features conventionally employed to train TTS acoustic models, i.e Mel cepstral (MCEP) coefficients, aperiodicity values and fundamental frequency (F0). In the other approach, following conventional speech enhancement methods, we train an RNN using only the MCEP coefficients extracted from the magnitude spectrum. The enhanced MCEP features and the phase extracted from noisy speech are combined to reconstruct the waveform which is then used to extract acoustic features to train the TTS system. We show that the second approach results in larger MCEP distortion but smaller F0 errors. Subjective evaluation shows that synthetic voices trained with data enhanced with this method were rated higher and with similar to scores to voices trained with clean speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult
Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279181 · Cited by 8,542
Cited by
SEGAN: Speech Enhancement Generative Adversarial Network
Pascual, S., Bonafonte, A., & Serrà, J. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-1428 · Cited by 1,297
PHASEN: A Phase-and-Harmonics-Aware Speech Enhancement Network
Yin, D., Luo, C., Xiong, Z., & Zeng, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6489 · Cited by 323
Real-Time Speech Enhancement Using Equilibriated RNN
Takeuchi, D., Yatabe, K., Koizumi, Y., Oikawa, Y., & Harada, N. (2020) · ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9054597 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Valentini-Botinhao, C., Wang, X., Takaki, S., & Yamagishi, J.
- Venue
- 9th ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW 9)
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2016-09-13
- Pages
- 146-152
- OpenAlex
- W2603567530
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating RNN-based speech enhancement methods for noise-robust Text-to-Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/ssw.2016-24
- The paper
- Valentini-Botinhao, C., Wang, X., Takaki, S., & Yamagishi, J. (2016). Investigating RNN-based speech enhancement methods for noise-robust Text-to-Speech. 9th ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW 9). https://doi.org/10.21437/ssw.2016-24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.