Cited by 93Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Short-read, high-throughput sequencing technology for STR genotyping

Open access

Abstract

DNA-based methods for human identification principally rely upon genotyping of short tandem repeat (STR) loci. Electrophoretic-based techniques for variable-length classification of STRs are universally utilized, but are limited in that they have relatively low throughput and do not yield nucleotide sequence information. High-throughput sequencing technology may provide a more powerful instrument for human identification, but is not currently validated for forensic casework. Here, we present a systematic method to perform high-throughput genotyping analysis of the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) STR loci using short-read (150 bp) massively parallel sequencing technology. Open source reference alignment tools were optimized to evaluate PCR-amplified STR loci using a custom designed STR genome reference. Evaluation of this approach demonstrated that the 13 CODIS STR loci and amelogenin (AMEL) locus could be accurately called from individual and mixture samples. Sensitivity analysis showed that as few as 18,500 reads, aligned to an in silico referenced genome, were required to genotype an individual (>99% confidence) for the CODIS loci. The power of this technology was further demonstrated by identification of variant alleles containing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the development of quantitative measurements (reads) for resolving mixed samples.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2144/000113857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STR-NGS profiling has several advantages over the conventional method, including high throughput, low cost when running many samples, flexibility with which STR loci to include, quantitative measurements for mixed samples and high resolution for SNPs.

    “NGS-based STR (STR-NGS) profiling has several advantages over the conventional method, including high throughput, low cost when running many samples, flexibility with which STR loci to include, quantitative measurements for mixed samples and high resolution for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Bornman et al., 2012; Shin et al., 2017).”
  • Although NGS has been implemented for human identification in forensic genetics, retroactive analysis of whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing, cell line authentication has been limited to STR-CE.

    “Although NGS has been implemented for human identification in forensic genetics, retroactive analysis of whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing (Bornman et al., 2012; Børsting and Morling, 2015; Valle-Silva et al., 2022), cell line authentication has been limited to STR-CE.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bornman, D., Hester, M., Schuetter, J., Kasoji, M., Minard-Smith, A., Barden, C., Nelson, S., Godbold, G., Baker, C., Yang, B., Walther, J., Tornes, I., Yan, P., Rodriguez, B., Bundschuh, R., Dickens, M., Young, B., & Faith, S.
Affiliations
  • Battelle (US)
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
BioTechniques
Published
2012-04
Volume
2012
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9818
OpenAlex
W2321984718
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioTechniques (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA016058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
short tandem repeat genotyping, short-read sequencing, next-generation sequencing, personal identification, forensic DNA analysis, amelogenin, variant alleles, single nucleotide polymorphisms, reference genome alignment, sensitivity analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review