Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Generation of Deletion and Point Mutations with One Primer in a Single Cloning Step

Open access
Makarova, Olga, Kamberov, Emmanuel, Margolis, Ben·2000·BioTechniques

Abstract

Site-directed mutagenesis is an important technique for studying DNA and protein function. With the advent of PCR, several new approaches have been successfully developed (1,3,5–9). Early methods involved two-step PCR followed by subcloning, which is time consuming and error prone. Recently introduced site-directed mutagenesis kits such as QuikChangeTM Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (QCS) developed by Stratagene (La Jolla, CA, USA) is a widely used PCR-based system (4) that eliminates the necessity to subclone the amplified DNA fragment. It requires two complementary mutagenic oligonucleotide primers and uses a plasmid to amplify the desired product by highfidelity Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). Following temperature cycling, the product is treated by the restriction endonuclease DpnI (Stratagene) that will cut only fully or hemimethylated 5′-Gm6ATG-3′ DNA sequences. Thus, only the original parental methylated plasmid DNA will be digested. The remaining unmethylated and nicked double-stranded plasmid incorporating the desired mutations is then transformed into Epicurian Coli® XL-1Blue supercompetent cells (Stratagene). The yield of clones harboring mutations is very high and varies, depending on the template length, from 80% to more than 90% for 2.9-kb plasmids (4). Methods for generating internal deletions have been described by using inverse PCR, but these involved two steps (9). A simplified method for deletion mutagenesis is used in the ExSiteTM mutagenesis kit by Stratagene, but this method also involves the use of phosphorylated primers and a ligation step. The use of the QuikChange mutagenesis kit has been reported for introducing deletions or insertions of only 12 bp (4). Here, we present a significantly improved method based on the QuikChange system for generating deletion and point mutants. This method allows the use of a single primer to generate deletions exceeding 3000 bp and point mutations in a single linear amplification reaction. In our laboratory, we routinely use the QuikChange kit for point mutations. However, it was not clear how this protocol could be applied for deletions of more than 12 bp (4). We used a plasmid containing Pals1 cDNA (total length 6.7 kb) as a template to make several deletion and point mutants (2). The PCR mutagenesis reaction was performed in a reaction volume of 25 μL that included 1 μL plasmid DNA (in TE or water) from Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System by Promega (Madison, WI, USA) or from QIAprep® Spin miniprep kit by Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA) miniprep (100– 300 ng/μL) template DNA, 200 nM each primer, 200 μM dNTPs and 1.25 U Pfu enzyme in 1× Pfu DNA polymerase reaction buffer. A preliminary step of denaturation at 95°C for 3 min was followed by 18 cycles of PCR. These PCR cycles consisted of 15 s of denaturation at 95°C, 1 min of annealing at a temperature 2°C higher than the melting temperature (Tm) of the head of the primer to increase specificity of amplification (see below) and 12 min of extension at 68°C using a PTC200TM thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). In cases when the Tm exceeded the extension temperature, we applied a two-step PCR annealing and extending of 68°C. Finally, the PCR product was treated with 1 μL DpnI endonuclease for 2 h at 37°C and 2 μL DpnI-digested DNA was transformed into 50 μL Epicurean Coli XL1 Blue supercompetent cells. The number of kanamycin-resistant clones varied from 100 to 2000. We experimented with primer pairs that would result in the highest yield of the desired deletion. We routinely analyzed clones by PCR using primers flanking the deletions and obtained efficiencies of between 25% and 70%. Selected clones were sequenced and confirmed the PCR results. Table 1 summarizes different examples of primer pairs or single primers used in the mutagenesis experiments. For simplicity, the 5′ part of the primers complementary to the region upstream of the introduced deletion we called the tail, and the 3′ portion of the primer complementary to the region downstream of the deletion we called the head. As shown in Table 1, when using primer pairs of different design, deletions of up to 3 kb could be introduced into the plasmid by this simple one-step protocol. We believe that the same approach could be applied to any sequence because we successfully deleted several regions of the coding Benchmarks

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2144/00295bm08

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Makarova, O., Kamberov, E., & Margolis, B.
Venue
BioTechniques
Published
2000-11
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
970-972
ISSN
  • 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9818
OpenAlex
W10039931
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generation of Deletion and Point Mutations with One Primer in a Single Cloning Step. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/00295bm08
The paper
Makarova, O., Kamberov, E., & Margolis, B. (2000). Generation of Deletion and Point Mutations with One Primer in a Single Cloning Step. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/00295bm08

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.