The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites
Open accessAbstract
DNA methylation is implicated inmultiple normal cellular processes, in-cluding the regulation of tissue- and de-velopment-specific gene expression,imprinting, X-chromosome inactiva-tion, DNA repair, and the suppressionof parasitic DNA sequences. Aberrantgene promoter methylation and result-ing altered gene expression have beenassociated with cancers (1,2). Alteredmethylation patterns have been de-scribed in human sporadic cancers:genome-wide hypomethylation and lo-calized hypermethylation have been ob-served, and both alterations can be pre-sent in the same tumor (3). Togetherwith loss-of-heterozygosity and genemutations, transcriptional silencing bymethylation has been shown to be a ma-jor inactivating event of tumor suppres-sor genes in accordance with Knud-son’s two-hit hypothesis (4). Geneinactivation by promoter hypermethyla-tion and resulting loss of function havebeen shown for several cancer genesinvolved in DNA repair, cell cycle con-trol, apoptosis, angiogenesis, differenti-ation, metastasis/invasion, transcrip-tion, and signal transduction (1).A wide range of methods exists todetect genomic DNA methylation, in-cluding approaches to detect genome-wide and gene-specific methylation lev-els (5). Most methods used to analyzethe methylation status of a specific se-quence are based on bisulfite modifica-tion of the DNA. Following the treat-ment, the methylation status can beassessed as a sequence difference by se-quencing, methylation-specific PCR,methylation-sensitive single-strandedconformational polymorphism, methy-lation-sensitive single nucleotide primerextension (Ms-SNuPE), or restrictionenzyme digestion. Recently, high-throughput methods to detect site-spe-cific methylation have been developedusing the TaqMan
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kantarjian, H., Issa, J. J., Rosenfeld, C. S., Bennett, J. M., Albitar, M., DiPersio, J., Klimek, V., Slack, J., de Castro, C., Ravandi, F., et al. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21792 · Cited by 1,530
Self-citationPhase II Pilot Study of Vemurafenib in Patients With Metastatic BRAF -Mutated Colorectal Cancer
Kopetz, S., Desai, J., Chan, E., Hecht, J. R., O'Dwyer, P. J., Maru, D., Morris, V., Janku, F., Dasari, A., Chung, W., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.2497 · Cited by 697
Self-citationKondo, Y., Shen, L., Cheng, A. S., Ahmed, S., Boumber, Y., Charo, C., Yamochi, T., Urano, T., Furukawa, K., Kwabi-Addo, B., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.159 · Cited by 620
Self-citationIntegrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies three different subclasses of colon cancer
Shen, L., Toyota, M., Kondo, Y., Lin, E., Zhang, L., Guo, Y., Hernandez, N. S., Chen, X., Ahmed, S., Konishi, K., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704652104 · Cited by 559
Self-citationDNA Methylation Analysis by Pyrosequencing
Busato, F., & Tost, J. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Metagenomics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6418-1_799-1 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Colella, S., Shen, L., Baggerly, K. A., Issa, J.-P. J., & Krahe, R.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 146-150
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W1541216017
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/03351md01
- The paper
- Colella, S., Shen, L., Baggerly, K. A., Issa, J.-P. J., & Krahe, R. (2003). Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/03351md01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.