Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites

Open access
Colella, S., Shen, L., Baggerly, K.A., Issa, J.-P.J., Krahe, R.·2003·BioTechniques

Abstract

DNA methylation is implicated inmultiple normal cellular processes, in-cluding the regulation of tissue- and de-velopment-specific gene expression,imprinting, X-chromosome inactiva-tion, DNA repair, and the suppressionof parasitic DNA sequences. Aberrantgene promoter methylation and result-ing altered gene expression have beenassociated with cancers (1,2). Alteredmethylation patterns have been de-scribed in human sporadic cancers:genome-wide hypomethylation and lo-calized hypermethylation have been ob-served, and both alterations can be pre-sent in the same tumor (3). Togetherwith loss-of-heterozygosity and genemutations, transcriptional silencing bymethylation has been shown to be a ma-jor inactivating event of tumor suppres-sor genes in accordance with Knud-son’s two-hit hypothesis (4). Geneinactivation by promoter hypermethyla-tion and resulting loss of function havebeen shown for several cancer genesinvolved in DNA repair, cell cycle con-trol, apoptosis, angiogenesis, differenti-ation, metastasis/invasion, transcrip-tion, and signal transduction (1).A wide range of methods exists todetect genomic DNA methylation, in-cluding approaches to detect genome-wide and gene-specific methylation lev-els (5). Most methods used to analyzethe methylation status of a specific se-quence are based on bisulfite modifica-tion of the DNA. Following the treat-ment, the methylation status can beassessed as a sequence difference by se-quencing, methylation-specific PCR,methylation-sensitive single-strandedconformational polymorphism, methy-lation-sensitive single nucleotide primerextension (Ms-SNuPE), or restrictionenzyme digestion. Recently, high-throughput methods to detect site-spe-cific methylation have been developedusing the TaqMan

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2144/03351md01

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Colella, S., Shen, L., Baggerly, K. A., Issa, J.-P. J., & Krahe, R.
Venue
BioTechniques
Published
2003-07
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
146-150
ISSN
  • 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9818
OpenAlex
W1541216017
Cited by
514
References
0
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/03351md01
The paper
Colella, S., Shen, L., Baggerly, K. A., Issa, J.-P. J., & Krahe, R. (2003). Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing™ methylation analysis of CpG sites. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/03351md01

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.