The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative RT-PCR: Limits and Accuracy
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we determine the limits and accuracy of quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using a modification of the original protocol. The quantification of mRNA with this procedure requires a preliminary estimation of the target molecule (TM) concentration, established from experiments with an internal control molecule (ICM). A definitive quantification is then attained from serial dilutions of the reverse transcription reaction. The success of this latter step is dependent on maintaining an equivalent number of TM and ICM in the reaction. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the influence of the deviation between the TM and the ICM on the result. We show here that we can control the accuracy of the assay by fixing the limit of the TM/ICM ratio. Indeed, when the TM/ICM ratio is between 0.66 and 1.5 (i.e., the difference between TM and ICM is 1.5-fold), the final result has an error of approximately 10%. Exceeding this limit produces errors approaching 60%, as in the case of TM/ICM = 2. When the above conditions are respected, a difference as small as 20% between two samples can be determined with an accuracy of 95%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · Cited by 34,610
Pflugfelder, S. C., Jones, D., Ji, Z., Afonso, A., & Monroy, D. (1999) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1076/ceyr.19.3.201.5309 · Cited by 615
Regulation of serum amyloid A protein expression during the acute-phase response
JENSEN, L. E., & WHITEHEAD, A. S. (1998) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3340489 · Cited by 411
Lee, P. D., Sladek, R., Greenwood, C. M. T., & Hudson, T. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.217802 · Cited by 369
(2022) · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122170119 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Souazé, F., Ntodou-Thomé, A., Tran, C. Y., Rostène, W., & Forgez, P.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 280-285
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W2131091865
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative RT-PCR: Limits and Accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/96212rr01
- The paper
- Souazé, F., Ntodou-Thomé, A., Tran, C. Y., Rostène, W., & Forgez, P. (1996). Quantitative RT-PCR: Limits and Accuracy. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/96212rr01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.