PS4: A Next-Generation Dataset for Protein Single-Sequence Secondary Structure Prediction
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein secondary structure prediction is a subproblem of protein folding. A light-weight algorithm capable of accurately predicting secondary structure from only the protein residue sequence could provide useful input for tertiary structure prediction, alleviating the reliance on multiple sequence alignments typically seen in today's best-performing models. Unfortunately, existing datasets for secondary structure prediction are small, creating a bottleneck. We present PS4, a dataset of 18,731 nonredundant protein chains and their respective secondary structure labels. Each chain is identified, and the dataset is nonredundant against other secondary structure datasets commonly seen in the literature. We perform ablation studies by training secondary structure prediction algorithms on the PS4 training set and obtains state-of-the-art accuracy on the CB513 test set in zero shots.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Influence of Stereochemistry in a Local Approach for Calculating Protein Conformations
da Rocha, W., Liberti, L., Mucherino, A., & Malliavin, T. E. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01232 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peracha, O.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Peracha, Omar
- ORCID
- Peracha, Omar
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-11-24
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 63-70
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W4388982155
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BioTechniques (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- secondary structure prediction, single-sequence prediction, protein folding, zero-shot prediction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Secondary, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review