Cited by 24Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Lisdexamfetamine: A prodrug for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Popovic, Biljana, Bhattacharya, Pratik, Sivaswamy, Lalitha·2009·American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract

Purpose The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, indications, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, dosage, and administration of lisdexamfetamine are reviewed. Summary Lisdexamfetamine is the first prodrug formulation of the stimulant dextroamphetamine. It is approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children age 6-12 years and adults. Due to the need for enzymatic hydrolysis, there is a decreased liability for misuse and diversion with lisdexamfetamine. Moreover, due to the rate-limiting nature of hydrolysis, the toxicity potential and chances of overdose with lisdexamfetamine are reduced. The recommended starting dosage of lisdexamfetamine is 30 mg orally daily, which can be adjusted to a maximum dosage of 70 mg daily. Clinical trials in children age 6-12 years with ADHD found significant reductions in the ADHD symptoms with lisdexamfetamine compared with placebo. However, clinical studies in adolescents have not been conducted. The efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine in children with ADHD and comorbid psychiatric disorders also remain to be assessed. A controlled trial in adults similarly showed significant improvements in ADHD symptoms in all treatment groups. Long-term clinical trials and head-to-head comparison trials with existing stimulant formulations are necessary. The most common adverse effects include decreased appetite, insomnia, irritability, dizziness, and weight loss. Conclusion Clinical trials in childr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2146/ajhp080353

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popovic, B., Bhattacharya, P., & Sivaswamy, L.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Popovic, Biljana
Venue
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2009-11-15
Volume
66
Issue
22
Pages
2005-2012
ISSN
  • 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-2900
OpenAlex
W2090095267
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine, prodrugs, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, d-amphetamine, stimulant medication, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, adverse effects, abuse liability, children with ADHD, adult ADHD, psychiatric comorbidity, dosage and administration
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Humans, Prodrugs, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review