The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pharmacist interventions to enhance blood pressure control and adherence to antihypertensive therapy: Review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Pharmacist interventions to enhance blood pressure (BP) control and adherence to antihypertensive therapy in adults with essential hypertension were reviewed. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles describing pharmacist interventions intended to improve adherence to antihypertensive medications. Studies were included if they described a pharmacist intervention to improve medication adherence and analyzed adherence to therapy and BP control as outcomes. A fixed-effects model was used to combine data from randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were identified, testing 16 different interventions and containing data on 3280 enrolled patients. Although 87.5% of the interventions resulted in significant improvements in treatment outcomes, only 43.8% of the interventions were associated with significant increases in medication adherence. All interventions that increased antihypertensive medication adherence also significantly reduced BP. Almost all the interventions that were effective in increasing adherence to medication were complex, including combinations of different strategies. Meta-analysis of 2619 patients in 8 studies found that pharmacist interventions significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p = 0.002) and that the meta-analytic differences in SBP and DBP changes from baseline to endpoint in intervention and control groups were -4.9 ± 0.9 mm Hg (p < 0.001) and -2.6 ± 0.9 mm Hg (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: A literature review and meta-analysis showed that pharmacist interventions can significantly improve medication adherence, SBP, DBP, and BP control in patients with essential hypertension. Interventions were complex and multifaceted and included medication management in all analyzed studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chobanian, A. V., Bakris, G. L., Black, H. R., Cushman, W. C., Green, L. A., Izzo, J. L., Jones, D. W., Materson, B. J., Oparil, S., Wright, J. T., et al. (2003) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000107251.49515.c2 · Cited by 13,271
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Interventions to Enhance Patient Adherence to Medication Prescriptions: Scientific Review
McDonald, H. P., Garg, A. X., & Haynes, R. B. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2868 · Cited by 1,176
Cited by
Mossialos, E., Naci, H., & Courtin, E. (2013) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.04.003 · Cited by 104
Buis, L. R., Roberson, D. N., Kadri, R., Rockey, N. G., Plegue, M. A., Danak, S. U., Guetterman, T. C., Johnson, M. G., Choe, H. M., & Richardson, C. R. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19882 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgado, M. P., Morgado, S. R., Mendes, L. C., Pereira, L. J., & Castelo-Branco, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-253
- ISSN
- 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-2900
- OpenAlex
- W2117648121
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacist interventions to enhance blood pressure control and adherence to antihypertensive therapy: Review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2146/ajhp090656
- The paper
- Morgado, M. P., Morgado, S. R., Mendes, L. C., Pereira, L. J., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2011). Pharmacist interventions to enhance blood pressure control and adherence to antihypertensive therapy: Review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp090656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.