Implementation and optimization of automated dispensing cabinet technology
Abstract
PURPOSE: A multifaceted automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) optimization initiative at a large hospital is described. SUMMARY: The ADC optimization project, which was launched approximately six weeks after activation of ADCs in 30 patient care unit medication rooms of a newly established adult hospital, included (1) adjustment of par inventory levels (desired on-hand quantities of medications) and par reorder quantities to reduce the risk of ADC supply exhaustion and improve restocking efficiency, (2) expansion of ADC "common stock" (medications assigned to ADC inventories) to increase medication availability at the point of care, and (3) removal of some infrequently prescribed medications from ADCs to reduce the likelihood of product expiration. The purpose of the project was to address organizational concerns regarding widespread ADC medication stockouts, growing reliance on cart-fill medication delivery systems, and suboptimal medication order turnaround times. Leveraging of the ADC technology platform's reporting functionalities for enhanced inventory control yielded a number of benefits, including cost savings resulting from reduced pharmacy technician labor requirements (estimated at $2,728 annually), a substantial reduction in the overall weekly stockout percentage (from 3.2% before optimization to 0.5% eight months after optimization), an improvement in the average medication turnaround time, and estimated cost avoidance of $19,660 attributed to the reduced potential for product expiration. CONCLUSION: Efforts to optimize ADCs through par level optimization, expansion of common stock, and removal of infrequently used medications reduced pharmacy technician labor, decreased stockout percentages, generated opportunities for cost avoidance, and improved medication turnaround times.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
McCarthy et al. observed reduced pharmacy technician labour requirements.
“McCarthy et al. observed reduced pharmacy technician labour requirements.38”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
McCarthy et al. estimated cost avoidances to $19,660 from circumventing 835 infrequently used items to central pharmacy and avoiding expiration.
“McCarthy et al. estimated cost avoidances to $19,660 from circumventing 835 infrequently used items to central pharmacy and avoiding expiration.38”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Benefits in cost savings were also described as a reduction in staffing costs.
“Benefits in cost savings were also described as a reduction in staffing costs [13,23,38,54,59,63].”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jung, Y. Y., Walsh, Á., Patel, J., & Lai, K. (2025) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100599 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCarthy, B. C., & Ferker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCarthy, Bryan C.
- ORCID
- McCarthy, Bryan C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1531-1536
- ISSN
- 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-2900
- OpenAlex
- W2523492928
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
- Keywords
- automated dispensing cabinets, hospital pharmacy, drug inventory management, medication stockouts, common stock, drug expiration
- MeSH terms
- Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Point-of-Care Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review